He’s the solution, not the problem.
Nope, just like the Koran cannot be used neither can the Bible
1 Like
An admission the phrase is not in the Constitution. Thanks.
Ko
Wrekt
…
Of course it can.
…in his opinion
No, you had to have an eye witness to the fact that you saw Jesus.
Paul had no eye witness. Therefore no proof, therefore he is a false apostle.
Canucks are not authorities on our constitution. 
That’s not what it says.
of course it “Can” but the court would never support it as it would violate the first.
The government can not show religious favoritism.
Anyone of any nationality who chooses to study the US Constitution can be an authority on it.
clearly Iv read it can’t speak for yourself.
He’s pretty close. Don’t be a nationalist. It’s unbecoming.
Unless it’s an englishman.
Well that takes hubris. You know more than the Apostles concerning the matter?
An authority on what it says, not necessarily what it means.
That is the whole point of it.
to allow free expression and stop the creation of state religion something the founders greatly disliked about Europe.
Actually he did.
Nobody created a state religion. Separation is a political invention.
They weren’t in court. Don’t move the soccer goal.
The act of basing laws on the bible is the establishment of a state religion.
