conan
November 14, 2019, 12:14am
1
That hearsay is better then direct evidences?
Is this the road that libs want to go down? Proof of innocents? Creating law where their is none?
This entire hoax is noting more then gossip column around a water cooler…and the left wants to promote it as evidence?
Seriously?
A member of the Democratic side of the House Intelligence Committee, one of the members trying to create grounds for impeachment against President Trump, delivered a stunning lesson to other members of the committee on Wednesday.
Do you have a better source than WorldNetDaily?
1 Like
conan
November 14, 2019, 12:18am
3
There is a video of D Mike Quigley of ILL saying just that…at about 1 minute mark.
Is anyone else reporting this?
conan
November 14, 2019, 12:21am
6
I am a reporter.
Consider it being reported that is backed up by actual evidence.
WuWei
November 14, 2019, 12:22am
7
As your lawyer, I concur.
4 Likes
But that’s not what he said. He said it can be better under some circumstances. He did not offer an absolute preference for hearsay as you are suggesting.
#FAIL
This is exactly what he said.
1 Like
If you watch the tape, he clearly qualified the statement as applying in only some circumstances, he was not proposing an absolute standard.
Anyone who watches the tape can hear and see what went on.
GWH
November 14, 2019, 12:33am
12
Flashback from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
1 Like
GWH
November 14, 2019, 12:34am
13
Well, you see, when you got nothing, but you really WANT to impeach, you’ll settle for anything.
4 Likes
WuWei:
Good Lord.
What does God have to do with this?
Clearly you didn’t watch the video.
GWH:
Well, you see, when you got nothing, but you really WANT to impeach, you’ll settle for anything.
As rare as impeachment is, one would think it would only be started if something impeachy happened
GWH:
Yet, here we are.
Yes because of Trumps mouth. It’s always because of his mouth. I never see him blamed for anything. The buck never stops with him. It’s always someone else.
But the WB should not have reported me
But Biden did the same thing (no he didn’t)
But Burisma is corrupt (so is the Trump foundation)
Etc
Which is why they are deposing Taylor’s assistant tomorrow.
Taylor says his assistant told him about a call that southland had with trump on July 26.
Taylor,s testimony is second hand hearsay.
His assistant will be direct testimony.
Allan
GWH:
Well, you see, when you got nothing, but you really WANT to impeach, you’ll settle for anything.
Biggest nothing I ever saw.
Do me a favor.
Biden mentioned how many times in the memo of the call.
Mulvaney saying it was quid pro quo.
Allan