My oh my what remarkable timing.
A new sheriff comes to town and suddenly all the loot gets turned-in
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6318524221112
.
.
.
and FoxNews is not the only one
3 Likes
Not a good look for Biden, to say the least.
But if there’s an analogy that makes sense here, it’s definitely a looter turning in all their stolen stuff to a new sheriff in town, in order to avoid getting in trouble, for all the loot, they just admitted, to stealing. Question mark.
3 Likes
I think over time (perhaps quickly now) the narrative will change
from “stealing documents” — IOW he is hiding something"
to “ignoring a subpoena that was petty and vindictive in the first place” — IOW he is the Dems were using the FBI to persecute their enemies and Trump responded like an pompous arrogant man-child."
2 Likes
Any nuclear codes?
3 Likes
Not likely.
Biden was VP at the time. It’s more likely the home addresses of Benghazi staff.
Eithe rway it is clear that
- executives of certain levels routinely violate national security law by taking classified documents to places they should not
- the prosecution of Donald Trump is 100% about using government to quash dissent and attack opponents.
Democracy 101: If opposing the ruling party means they will send the cops, that is not democracy, That is everything we fight to oppose.
2 Likes
One guy has 10 documents that he immediately turns over to the national archives and cooperates fully.
The other has 300+ classified documents, ignores repeated requests for their return, then promises to return them and doesn’t. Then finally has to get his home raided so they can be retrieved.
Not quite the same.
2 Likes
As I predicted the narrative changed form
“Trump kept documents that’s a crime.”
“Trump kept documents that’s a crime.”
“Trump kept documents that’s a crime.”
to
“Trump ignored a subpoena that’s a crime.”
Guy A steps in the street— no problem.
Guy B steps in the street— no problem.
Regime supporter steps in the street— no problem.
Regime opponent steps in the street— and it’s "Let’s keep changing our story until we find a way to jail our political opponent. Our rea lgoal is to jail the opponents.
.
.
.
It’s happening.
The only thing evil men to succeed is for good men to pretend they don’t see the obvious.
3 Likes
The narrative didn’t change. The whataboutism did.
4 Likes
“How responsive were they?”(Karl) Rove asked. “When the Biden people found out about it, they called immediately, called the appropriate authorities and turned them over. We spent a year and a half watching the drama unfold in Mar-a-Lago, and it had to end in a police search to recover the documents.” (Said Rove)
It was up to twelve with the first batch. We don’t know the number of classified documents in the second batch.
They were “found” documents to the attorney who for unknown reasons came across them in 2022.
They were “taken” documents to whoever took them in 2017 and put them in Biden’s private office.
Let’s not confuse the two.
1 Like
I cut my adult teeth in politics as a summer intern for Amnesty International, often working on the cases of persecuted persons with whom I held very pronounced ideological differences (iow trying to get bona fide commies out of 3rd world prisons.)
-
When the left salivated about indicting Karl Rove I said “That’s wrong they are simply eager to jail their political opponents. That is 3rd world dictator stuff.”
-
I said similar things when the right said “Lock her up” (regarding Hillary.)
-
I was 100% opposed to Donald Trump breaking -up a protest in Lafayette Park so he could pretend to go to church.
.
.
.
I have not changed. I have been consistent.
Right now it is the left who is wiping their butts with the Constitution.
What the left is saying and doing regarding Pres Trump and the documents is absolutely appalling.
I sincerely hope they do not have children.
So J’Biden sends his “personal lawyers” to clean out closets at his old offices? 
When do the search warrants and raids start?
Are we getting ready for the congressional hearings that are coming?
3 Likes
Nope.
All bets are off now with the discovery of another batch at another office.
Once is explainable.
Twice is the start of a pattern….whether willful or just plain carelessness, we don’t know yet.
There needs to be a full investigation now at all places where Biden is storing documents.
And there needs to be a mapping of how these batches of documents came to be at these offices.
3 Likes
Would we be here if Trump simply turned over the documents when the National Archives politely requested he do so?
NOPE.
Guy A steps in the street— no problem.
Guy B steps in the street— no problem.
Regime supporter steps in the street— no problem.
Regime opponent steps in the street — and his political opponents are using law enforcement to try to bar him from future office and possibly jail him.
Do you SERIOUSLY want me to believe this is about stepping off curbs?
This is exactly precisely the way democracy dies.
It is dying before your eyes and you are trying to score political points off the process.
Despicable.
4 Likes
I am assuming you think it’s overkill the way they are going after Trump, in which case your mind is made up…but it is actually true that had Trump simply complied with returning all the documents, the “regime” wouldn’t have been able to go after him.
And it wouldn’t have been “knuckling under to the regime” to turn them back over to the government.
The documents weren’t his to keep.
What I am hearing is
“And if that black man had not stepped off the curb
the regime would not have prosecuted him for stepping off that curb.”
16 people park their car on the street.
The police ticket and tow only the guy who is anti-cop.
The argument “Well if he hadn’t parked his car on the street . . .”
makes my stomach churn. When the emperor has no clothes most people at least most people were silent. Most people weren’t actually trying to run interference on his behalf.
1 Like
That’s a very convoluted way of saying it’s always someone else’s fault.
1 Like
