No it doesn’t. The original poem did, but the Anthem never has.
NMAH | The Lyrics
Francis Scott Key completed four verses and copied them onto a sheet of paper, probably making more than one copy.
No it doesn’t. The original poem did, but the Anthem never has.
Sure it does; that’s what it’s about.
Link it
Apparently you don’t know what you are talking about.
Well between you and I… only one of us knew the op was about race. Wanna take a guess?
Mountain_Soldier:I’m not trying to do that. I know your stances are all to the left and all they do is sacrosanct and the right is wrong.
Nothing the left can do is wrong. I understand it.
Actually, the left can do quite a bit wrong and downright silly.
However, and to my knowledge, this came from the NFL, not “the left”.
The NFL has demonstrated itself to be left.
Supreme_War_Pig: Samm: PurpnGold: Samm:No it doesn’t. Not anymore. You’re still living in the past.
That term refers to segregation. Period. No one uses “Separate but equal” outside of referring to plessy v Ferguson
Again your history chops are the best
“Separate but equal” may have originated from segregation, but there is no hint of segregation in the Star Spangled Banner, so when you speak of Lift Every Voice as a “separate but equal” anthem, you are living in the past as well as being delusional.
And, by the way, “separate but equal” also is used to refer to Title IX, which has absolutely nothing to do with Plessy v. Ferguson. History chops my ass.
True, but it does reference slavery
No it doesn’t. The original poem did, but the Anthem never has.
Incorrect. All of the verses are in the anthem, but typically just the first is sung.
Francis Scott Key completed four verses and copied them onto a sheet of paper, probably making more than one copy.
Please note that the link provided is to the National Museum of American History, not some random crank on the internet
Samm:Sure it does; that’s what it’s about.
Link it
No. If you want to discuss it in detail, start a new thread.
Samm:Apparently you don’t know what you are talking about.
Well between you and I… only one of us knew the op was about race. Wanna take a guess?
Are you saying that for the first time ever, you found a topic that is not about race?
No. If you want to discuss it in detail, start a new thread.
Oh NOW you want to deflect
You got caught, again.
Are you saying that for the first time ever, you found a topic that is not about race?
This topic is about race… you still haven’t read the OP?
Samm: Supreme_War_Pig: Samm: PurpnGold: Samm:No it doesn’t. Not anymore. You’re still living in the past.
That term refers to segregation. Period. No one uses “Separate but equal” outside of referring to plessy v Ferguson
Again your history chops are the best
“Separate but equal” may have originated from segregation, but there is no hint of segregation in the Star Spangled Banner, so when you speak of Lift Every Voice as a “separate but equal” anthem, you are living in the past as well as being delusional.
And, by the way, “separate but equal” also is used to refer to Title IX, which has absolutely nothing to do with Plessy v. Ferguson. History chops my ass.
True, but it does reference slavery
No it doesn’t. The original poem did, but the Anthem never has.
Incorrect. All of the verses are in the anthem, but typically just the first is sung.
Please note that the link provided is to the National Museum of American History, not some random crank on the internet
Yes, those are the complete lyrics written in 1814, but only the first stanza is recognized as the Anthem. Regardless, it is disingenuous to assert that the Anthem is racists (as some here have done) simply because the author was a slave owner and the word “slave” is found in the complete, original poem.
Samm:No. If you want to discuss it in detail, start a new thread.
Oh NOW you want to deflect
You got caught, again.
You caught nothing but yourself. One cannot deflect by refusing to become embroiled in a discussion that is off topic to the thread. In fact, the opposite is true.
Samm:Are you saying that for the first time ever, you found a topic that is not about race?
This topic is about race… you still haven’t read the OP?
I know, but you said only one of us knew that, so since I know it is not me, I assumed it must be you.
You caught nothing but yourself. One cannot deflect by refusing to become embroiled in a discussion that is off topic to the thread. In fact, the opposite is true.
A discussion YOU started. Now when you get called out you deflect “start a thread on it”
No, YOU Start a thread on it. You brought it up… not me.
Supreme_War_Pig: Samm: Supreme_War_Pig: Samm: PurpnGold: Samm:No it doesn’t. Not anymore. You’re still living in the past.
That term refers to segregation. Period. No one uses “Separate but equal” outside of referring to plessy v Ferguson
Again your history chops are the best
“Separate but equal” may have originated from segregation, but there is no hint of segregation in the Star Spangled Banner, so when you speak of Lift Every Voice as a “separate but equal” anthem, you are living in the past as well as being delusional.
And, by the way, “separate but equal” also is used to refer to Title IX, which has absolutely nothing to do with Plessy v. Ferguson. History chops my ass.
True, but it does reference slavery
No it doesn’t. The original poem did, but the Anthem never has.
Incorrect. All of the verses are in the anthem, but typically just the first is sung.
Please note that the link provided is to the National Museum of American History, not some random crank on the internet
Yes, those are the complete lyrics written in 1814, but only the first stanza is recognized as the Anthem. Regardless, it is disingenuous to assert that the Anthem is racists (as some here have done) simply because the author was a slave owner and the word “slave” is found in the complete, original poem.
What is it with you guys today? It’s like you think if you repeat a falsehood enough times, we’ll believe it.
I know, but you said only one of us knew that, so since I know it is not me, I assumed it must be you.
Dis you?
Yes … Purp made it about race. No doubt about it. Everything is about race to Purp.
Who started this thread Samm… tell me pretty please.
Samm:You caught nothing but yourself. One cannot deflect by refusing to become embroiled in a discussion that is off topic to the thread. In fact, the opposite is true.
A discussion YOU started. Now when you get called out you deflect “start a thread on it”
No, YOU Start a thread on it. You brought it up… not me.
I did not start a discussion. I simply pointed to Title IX as an example of “separate but equal” which has nothing to do with racial segregation. You’re the only one who wants to discuss it … for what purpose, I cannot imagine, since it has nothing to do with the OP topic.
What is it with you guys today? It’s like you think if you repeat a falsehood enough times, we’ll believe it.
What specifically are you referring to?
Samm:I know, but you said only one of us knew that, so since I know it is not me, I assumed it must be you.
Dis you?
Samm:Yes … Purp made it about race. No doubt about it. Everything is about race to Purp.
Who started this thread Samm… tell me pretty please.
When I said “Purp made it about race,” I was not referring to the OP. Follow the arrows back. I’m not going to spend the time to show you what that comment did refer to.