I watched about the first five minutes of it. She played the victim card and tried to set him up so that any hard debate would look like he was attacking a poor defenseless woman. I had enough after 5 minutes.
Of course she needed support. No way she could handle one on one.
Are you asking who needs to be able to defend themselves more? Because the answer is not the rich. I had a much greater need of that ability when I was poor than I do now that I am not.
And? Poor people are more at risk, I don’t think the fact that it isn’t from anonymous fans is much comfort to them. Nor are most rich people famous. It’s easy to advocate removing people’s right to self-defense when you are A. not at risk and B. can afford armed protection. Even most celebrities do not face the same level of risk a poor person in a bad neighborhood does. And even if they did, they can afford security, the poor can’t.
Hell I don’t need a gun there is virtually no crime in my affluent neighborhood. It was an entirely different story when I was poor. What passes forf crime around here on the ring app is Amazon sub-contractors of color dropping off a package and taking a photo. That is literally like the last five “crime” alerts I have gotten this month lol.