The title is factually incorrect. The bipartisan conclusion is not that there was no collusion.
The bipartisan conclusion was that they had found “no direct evidence” of a conspiracy.
Rarely do conspiracy cases present direct evidence.
There are mountains of indirect or circumstantial evidence, as was pointed out by the leading Democrat on the committee, something that belies the suggestion that it is a bipartisan conclusion that there was no collusion.
I’ll just leave this final thought here. Two words. I believe they’ll have some import in the future.
But but…but those are the facts according to Trump…at least those are the ones he buys into. So for all intents and purposes, those are the facts of Today. LOL
“Democrats say this report will not be good for Donald Trump. It will question the judgment of many people in the Trump orbit for having the meetings and allowing themselves to be preyed upon by a Russian intelligence operation that sought to interfere in the election and to help Donald Trump. But, again,no direct proof of a conspiracy.”
Many Dems will need to face reality… Collusion delusion and an attempted coup by Obama hold overs…
The title makes a big difference, it’s what most see. So taking it out “bipartisan” diminishes my point, thus helping the dems. And it’s not like we lack space on the board…