Yes wanted and denied. If you had any credibility before this, it’s gone.
1 Like
Lie times two, it wasn’t forbidden and it wasn’t grounds for mistrial as the judge ruled.
Again comparing a third part in audience to a witness or accused is pathetic.
1 Like
Aka they wanted it forbidden to cry in court.
Allan
It wasn’t a third party. It’s was the victims mother.
Allan
So what part of “The judge denied the request,” did you not understand?
Both were perfectly fine. Didn’t you read your link before posting it?
Why do you keep doing this to yourself Allan?
On a mission to destroy his own credibility, weird, but obviously true.
How come the prosecution in the rittenhouse trial not ask for a mistrial like they did in the Arbery trial?
Allan
Because they’re white.
Umm pretty sure the prosecution did no such thing.
Apparently someone doesn’t understand the difference between the defense lawyers and the prosecution.
1 Like
Give it up Allan. You are obviously confused.
Nope.
Crying in Arbery court. Mistrial asked for.
Crying in Rittenhouse court. A okay
Don’t be obtuse.
Allan
The ONLY person being obtuse here is you.
Answer me this:
Was a mistrial granted in the Arbery case?
Simple Yes or No.
Lol, you think it shouldn’t be allowed for the person being tried to cry? How does that work exactly?
No, but why was it asked for?
Allan
Have to ask them, they are the only ones that can answer it. We can only guess.
Who was crying in each case?
Obviously there weren’t grounds for a mistrial.
No mistrial in either case. Get it straight.
