They’ve literally been held up in court for years. Don’t be naive indeed. Learn how things work dude.
It’s not an act.
It’s not an act.
Ooh personal shots. So brave.
thinkingman: W_and_C: thinkingman: W_and_C: thinkingman: Apocalypto:Let me rephrase it; if trump’s taxes clearly show that he laundered money, will you vote for him?
if trump ever did anything illegal with his taxes you can bet it would have been known by now
But let’s say he did and somehow it wasn’t found till now. Does he have your vote ?
you mean…
“if the idiot democrats and their activist press accomplices can make it look like he did will you still vote despite…?”
No, if he actually did and you are convinced that he’s guilty. Does he still have your vote ?
“still?”
hw do you know i was going to vote for him in the first place?
Ok, i’ll redact that. Does he have your vote ?
why i dont know.
it all depends on so many factors
nov is a long way off
markdido:It’s not an act.
Ooh personal shots. So brave.
So is pretending that the IRS over the years has never audited Trump and would have discovered any malfeasance.
Not exactly, but they will often give the White House and Congress a heads up before the public announcement so they can get their ■■■■ together for the response.
■■■■ that.
It should be a Maury Povich reveal.
“The results confirm…you are the tax cheat!”
- Nancy Pelosi jumps up, does a dab, says “I told all y’all! Nuh uh! Nuh uh! Pay up!!”
So is pretending that the IRS ove the years has never audited Trump and would have discovered any malfeasance.
Oh you mean the audit he’s been lying about for years pretending that’s why he couldn’t release his taxes? That fake audit?
TommyLucchese: markdido:It’s not an act.
Ooh personal shots. So brave.
So is pretending that the IRS over the years has never audited Trump and would have discovered any malfeasance.
such a fine upstanding org, totally unbiased and true to their mission…
(so unlike the fbi)
W_and_C:Why, presidents get SCOTUS rulings the night before ? Like a sneak preview before every audience sees it ?
Not exactly, but they will often give the White House and Congress a heads up before the public announcement so they can get their ■■■■ together for the response.
And you know this how?
markdido:So is pretending that the IRS ove the years has never audited Trump and would have discovered any malfeasance.
Oh you mean the audit he’s been lying about for years pretending that’s why he couldn’t release his taxes? That fake audit?
if you know something about trump’s taxes that we don’t know (apart from what showed up in maddow’s mailbox) please…
spill it
I think the court will save the banks from releasing his records
And you know this how?
IRS said they weren’t auditing him.
Also, they don’t release the results of audits.
So you’re oh for two there, slugger. Wanna try to whiff on a third? Feel like you have it in you.
if you know something about trump’s taxes that we don’t know (apart from what showed up in maddow’s mailbox) please…
spill it
Convenient way to dodge the fact that the IRS wouldn’t say ■■■■ unless it was a criminal prosecution and even then they still wouldn’t say ■■■■■ the USA would. Or did we forget about that?
thinkingman:if you know something about trump’s taxes that we don’t know (apart from what showed up in maddow’s mailbox) please…
spill it
Convenient way to dodge the fact that the IRS wouldn’t say ■■■■ unless it was a criminal prosecution and even then they still wouldn’t say ■■■■■ the USA would. Or did we forget about that?
yeah and here you are pretending to believe none of the raging wide-eyed loon leftists within the irs wouldnt ever leak anything
get real once
yeah and here you are pretending to believe none of the raging wide-eyed loon leftists within the irs wouldnt ever leak anything
get real once
Oh this is like your “the lack of legal trouble in the Obama administration proves how corrupt it was” thing.
Lol. Okay dude.
thinkingman:yeah and here you are pretending to believe none of the raging wide-eyed loon leftists within the irs wouldnt ever leak anything
get real once
Oh this is like your “the lack of legal trouble in the Obama administration proves how corrupt it was” thing.
Lol. Okay dude.
“obama?”
lay off the “D’s dogs” and iron city Tommy
dont know what youre talking about
And you know this how?
The speed at which a response is typically produced indicates advance notice.
Also, I briefly dated one of Congressman Oxley’s communications people about 15 years ago; there was a big decision around a whistleblower thing related to SOX, and I remember her getting wind and working on something before the ruling was announced. It was inconvenient for me.
Understand also that federal judicial clerks are often personal friends with congressional aides.
Serious question, if trump’s taxes clearly show that he laundered money, would you still vote for him?
Only over Hillary and Sniffer Biden along with any other old white guy that capitulates to cancel culture and the far left.
Apocalypto:Serious question, if trump’s taxes clearly show that he laundered money, would you still vote for him?
Only over Hillary and Sniffer Biden along with any other old white guy that capitulates to cancel culture and the far left.
But if Kamala Harris were the nominee, you would not vote Trump ?
But if Kamala Harris were the nominee, you would not vote Trump ?
I would not vote for her. She locked people up in her district for marijuana and then laughed about herself smoking it in college.
The left runs the absolute worst candidates available. I thought you guys were gonna push for tom hanks this time. Him I would have probably voted for. Instead you guys went for the sniffer. I will vote Trump over him no matter how checkered trumps past.