Sarah Sanders confirms Trump spoke to Putin about Mueller probe

DougBH · 2019-05-04T00:12:20.048Z

Apparently you consider two heads of state meeting to be proof of Trump being compromised. Since Mueller spent two years trying to tie something on Trump, if the meeting in Helsinki were evidence of Trumps being compromised, then Mueller would have latched on to it.
Hope you get it now.

amadeus · 2019-05-04T00:16:35.547Z

DougBH:

Apparently you consider two heads of state meeting to be proof of Trump being compromised. Since Mueller spent two years trying to tie something on Trump, if the meeting in Helsinki were evidence of Trumps being compromised, then Mueller would have latched on to it.
Hope you get it now.

Has nothing to do with Mueller. It has everything to do with explanatory power. “Hope you get it now.” That’s exactly how I talk to my students. Great technique! You should try teaching.

DougBH · 2019-05-04T00:18:18.849Z

amadeus:

Hope you get it now.

No, I didn’t think yo would.

WuWei · 2019-05-04T00:19:29.702Z

amadeus:

DougBH:

Apparently you consider two heads of state meeting to be proof of Trump being compromised. Since Mueller spent two years trying to tie something on Trump, if the meeting in Helsinki were evidence of Trumps being compromised, then Mueller would have latched on to it.
Hope you get it now.

Has nothing to do with Mueller. It has everything to do with explanatory power. “Hope you get it now.” That’s exactly how I talk to my students. Great technique! You should try teaching.

So you’re working off of theories and hypothesis?

amadeus · 2019-05-04T00:30:01.766Z

Another example of exceptional pedagogy.

amadeus · 2019-05-04T00:34:00.948Z

WuWei:

amadeus:

DougBH:

Apparently you consider two heads of state meeting to be proof of Trump being compromised. Since Mueller spent two years trying to tie something on Trump, if the meeting in Helsinki were evidence of Trumps being compromised, then Mueller would have latched on to it.
Hope you get it now.

Has nothing to do with Mueller. It has everything to do with explanatory power. “Hope you get it now.” That’s exactly how I talk to my students. Great technique! You should try teaching.

So you’re working off of theories and hypothesis?

Theories and hypotheses mean different things to different people. Is this stated in a colloquial sense or in a scientific sense? They are different things.

WuWei · 2019-05-04T00:37:13.495Z

amadeus:

WuWei:

amadeus:

DougBH:

Apparently you consider two heads of state meeting to be proof of Trump being compromised. Since Mueller spent two years trying to tie something on Trump, if the meeting in Helsinki were evidence of Trumps being compromised, then Mueller would have latched on to it.
Hope you get it now.

Has nothing to do with Mueller. It has everything to do with explanatory power. “Hope you get it now.” That’s exactly how I talk to my students. Great technique! You should try teaching.

So you’re working off of theories and hypothesis?

Theories and hypotheses mean different things to different people. Is this stated in a colloquial sense or in a scientific sense? They are different things.

Are they? Your “explanatory power” requires one or the other, you choose.

amadeus · 2019-05-04T00:40:47.483Z

Neither. I’ll choose a law of nature. Simply a generalization based on repeated observation. So far, it’s shown to be very useful.

WuWei · 2019-05-04T00:43:11.296Z

amadeus:

Neither. I’ll choose a law of nature. Simply a generalization based on repeated observation. So far, it’s shown to be very useful.

Psuedo-intellectual horse hockey.

Have a nice day.

amadeus · 2019-05-04T00:43:53.452Z

WuWei:

amadeus:

Neither. I’ll choose a law of nature. Simply a generalization based on repeated observation. So far, it’s shown to be very useful.

Psuedo-intellectual horse hockey.

Have a nice day.

Not at all. You’ve been outplayed.

WuWei · 2019-05-04T00:45:49.440Z

amadeus:

WuWei:

amadeus:

Neither. I’ll choose a law of nature. Simply a generalization based on repeated observation. So far, it’s shown to be very useful.

Psuedo-intellectual horse hockey.

Have a nice day.

Not at all. You’ve been outplayed.

ok, if you say so.

Blackwolf · 2019-05-04T00:48:58.218Z

Donald is just keeping his enemies close so he can manipulate them. It’s testament to his genius.

Unlike Clinton and Obama who to this day remain Putin’s loyal puppets.

CaughtInTheMiddle · 2019-05-04T01:05:00.871Z

ohknow35:

Apocalypto:

They meddled in our elections!

You’d think the president at the time might have said something about that.

Or this one.

WuWei · 2019-05-04T01:56:56.489Z

CaughtInTheMiddle:

ohknow35:

Apocalypto:

They meddled in our elections!

You’d think the president at the time might have said something about that.

Or this one.

He doesn’t have to President the way you feeeeel he should.

madasheck · 2019-05-04T04:04:45.765Z

You think Trumpers will understand this?

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1124367490203648001

WuWei · 2019-05-04T12:47:58.062Z

madasheck:

You think Trumpers will understand this?

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1124367490203648001

Childish reductio ad absurdum is not difficult to understand.

Kelby · 2019-05-04T13:08:57.271Z

Apocalypto:

Fat donald talked to Putin about Mueller but refused to talk to Mueller. Just about sums it up.

Wow…

WuWei · 2019-05-04T13:09:57.335Z

Kelby:

Apocalypto:

Fat donald talked to Putin about Mueller but refused to talk to Mueller. Just about sums it up.

Wow…

What good could Trump (or anybody else) get from talking to Mueller?

Trump would be a fool to say a word to Robert Mueller.

Kelby · 2019-05-04T13:13:15.546Z

WuWei:

Kelby:

Apocalypto:

Fat donald talked to Putin about Mueller but refused to talk to Mueller. Just about sums it up.

Wow…

What good could Trump (or anybody else) get from talking to Mueller?

Trump would be a fool to say a word to Robert Mueller.

Yes, sitting down with Mueller for a formal interview to clear his name/remove suspicions about his campaign activities would have been wrong to do.

After all, why would an innocent person do that?

WuWei · 2019-05-04T13:31:14.587Z

Kelby:

WuWei:

Kelby:

Apocalypto:

Fat donald talked to Putin about Mueller but refused to talk to Mueller. Just about sums it up.

Wow…

What good could Trump (or anybody else) get from talking to Mueller?

Trump would be a fool to say a word to Robert Mueller.

Yes, sitting down with Mueller for a formal interview to clear his name/remove suspicions about his campaign activities would have been wrong to do.

After all, why would an innocent person do that?

You must be joking.