“Russia” hoax was 100% manufactured by Obama admin

“earth shattering”? who called it that?

i bet that was on cnn

And always wrong.

They are good debaters but in the end always on the wrong side of the issue.

Like I said the fact that Russia Russia Russia was a made up hoax first designed to keep Trump out of the White House and then to cripple his administration is not news. We all called it. Remember back in the day when there were 2-3 threads daily about Trump and Russians….where’s jezcoe to tell us to read the Mueller report (he did a better job quitting the forum than I did!)

It was created by the same people who claimed the laptop was Russian disinformation, that Joe was fine nothing to see here….

These people, Comey and clapper and Brennan and Susan rice and all the Obama surrogates……cleaning all of them out of positions of power is the best thing that can happen to this country.

3 Likes

Since the released emails are specifically talking about cyberattacks, can someone point me to some public remarks from anyone in the Obama Administration that definitively said Russia committed cyberattacks against the US election apparatus?

exactly. all corrupt jokes

1 Like

as the op says. and as a whistle blower says. and as tulsi claims she has proof of…

obama admin used intel agencies as PR to push “collusion” narrative even though they knew full well russia did nothing

does anyone else need s summary of the op?

1 Like

Answer the question I actually asked, please.

There’s a reason I don’t think anyone should take any of those people seriously. Look at how many tall tales they tried to spin, at how they were always on the wrong side of the truth.

Most of those same posters are still on this forum. After a decade of them telling us how things should be and being wrong every single time…forgive me but I see no reason anyone should ever believe those people ever.

We’ll see if the Trump admin and AG Bondi runs with all of this.

But the fact that Russia Russia Russia was a lie….thats decade old news.

1 Like

I did because it’s presidential treason. 100 percent!

I bet it was on cnn too

The memo is talking about Russian cyberattacks… why do you keep pivoting to collusion?

1 Like

I will ask another question and see if it gets answered.

Is an intelligence report concluding that the Russians did not attempt and probably did not have the capacity to attempt large scale cyberattacks against US election infrastructure the same thing as the “Russia Hoax was 100% manufactured by the Obama Adminsitration”?

Do you see the juxtaposition the Trump Administration and the New York Post did here?

1 Like

I am in favor of trying people, but treason is notoriously hard to prove.

Seditious conspiracy or fraud against the US are more likely charges.

Before any charges are brought, congress needs to end the farce of the DC district court so that jury pools are not limited DC residents.

2 Likes

Well Major fraud against the US would be a massive stretch of interpretation and seditious conspiracy is just conservative fantasy.

I saw a chyron on fox saying russia did not change votes and I thought we already knew that.

Waiting for the trial.

Actually Bill is pretty spot on this time. What is alleged is a betrayal of the nation as a whole, for partisan political motives. But it isn’t, as defined by the constitution, treason. Taking actions to undermine the elected government through falsehoods, including conspiracy by individuals in government positions to use deception to undermine the elected government, is criminal.

4 Likes

And none of this happened.

…and our corrupt media and politicians ran with it. Don’t ever forget the lying piece of Schiff who has “undeniable proof”.

1 Like

Your opinion is noted. And it will be for a jury to decide.

Wait… you actually think this is going to trial? :rofl::rofl:

I know you are smarter than this.

If there was anything worth prosecuting why didn’t she get an indictment before putting this information out on social media?

Doubtful…not because laws weren’t broken but DC is that corrupt. Just ask any J6er. Now they were really baaa, baaa, baaad.

1 Like

This does seem a bit Watergate like.

That said, Obama has been out of office since 2016. And precedent has already been established that you can’t try presidents for things done in office once they are out of office. Trump got that benefit recently. So I doubt he will try to push anything.

1 Like