It appears that this could be the biggest scandal in the history of the U.S. And many of your favorite lib news sources are not covering it because they were part of the scam. It appears that the democratic leadership (including Saint Barack) used the DOJ to manufacture fake evidence to take down Trump. This would certainly be the biggest threat to democracy led by the people who claim everything that trump does is a threat to democracy. I know how the liberal mind works, so your responses will be predictable. Either you believe that you beloved politicians are perfect saints incapable of dishonesty. Or you claim they are innocent and demand “proof” even when the evidence is overwhelming. Libs, this is gonna get worse for you before it gets better. In the mean time. You’re welcome for providing information that your “news” sources don’t want you to have.
It wasn’t “cooked up”. Why are we still talking about something that was thoroughly investigated by Trump admin 1… the Senate…?
Russian was a bad actor… but they didn’t logically change any votes. And Trumps team was up to their eyeballs in Russian contacts… mainly Manafort and Stone.
I know how the liberal mind works, so your responses will be predictable. Either you believe that you beloved politicians are perfect saints incapable of dishonesty. Or you claim they are innocent and demand “proof” even when the evidence is overwhelming.
That Senate report was produced well after Trump was elected. By a Republican senate during Trump admin 1.
All the Obama admin did was investigate what they thought was a threat to the US. And they were right to investigate because Russian was all in and around Trump campaign and attempting to target actual voting machine and voter databases.
It was entirely cooked up. There was no collusion, there was no coordination, there was no conspiracy, there was no anything.
They had contacts… so what? Doesn’t every major candidate for President either himself or through advisors have overseas contacts?
I believe it was stone, who was the only one who did anything (after he left the campaign) who asked a third party to see if they could get wiileaks to release more emails. wikileaks said no. If they had, is that illegal?
