Rsbn live- Mike Lindell Cyber Symposium

[Smyrna]

@Jezcoe

How is fraud perpetrated when the machine count matches up to the hand recount to well within the margin of error?

Let’s let the Arizona audit answer that and Dominion honor their subpoena.

[Jezcoe]

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

How is fraud perpetrated when the machine count matches up to the hand recount to well within the margin of error?

Let’s let the Arizona audit answer that and Dominion honor their subpoena.

Arizona did a full hand recount. It is done as a matter of law.

The Cyber Ninja audit did a hand recount in way that has never ever ever been done before using lazy susans.

Whose hand recount would you trust? The officials who have done it many times before or the people who have never audited an election and have made many embarassing mistakes in the past few months?

[PurpnGold]

@Smyrna

The machines have never been forensically examined. The real question is, why the ■■■■ are “we” even using machines?

If they were never forensically examined, how did Lindell get data from said machines?

[Smyrna]

@Jezcoe

Arizona did a full hand recount. It is done as a matter of law.

The Cyber Ninja audit did a hand recount in way that has never ever ever been done before using lazy susans.

Whose hand recount would you trust? The officials who have done it many times before or the people who have never audited an election and have made many embarassing mistakes in the past few months?

I’ll wait on the report. Then we can evaluate that.

[Smyrna]

@PurpnGold

If they were never forensically examined, how did Lindell get data from said machines?

Let it go to court and both sides can ask?

[PurpnGold]

@Smyrna

@PurpnGold

If they were never forensically examined, how did Lindell get data from said machines?

Let it go to court and both sides can ask?

Huh?

That doesn’t answer my question.

If the machines were never forensically examined (your claim), then Lindell has bogus data, right?

[Smyrna]

@PurpnGold

Huh?

That doesn’t answer my question.

If the machines where never forensically examined (you claim), then Lindell has bogus data, right?

The machines were never forensically examined by a legal source that is scrutinized for accuracy that could be used in a court of law. The Arizona audit is the first and is initiating this same type of audit in other states. If they find nothing, I can live with that. If they find fraud, then how massive, did it change the outcome, who is behind it and when will they be prosecuted?

[Jezcoe]

@Smyrna

@PurpnGold

Huh?

That doesn’t answer my question.

If the machines where never forensically examined (you claim), then Lindell has bogus data, right?

The machines were never forensically examined by a legal source that is scrutinized for accuracy that could be used in a court of law. The Arizona audit is the first and is initiating this same type of audit in other states. If they find nothing, I can live with that. If they find fraud, then how massive, did it change the outcome, who is behind it and when will they be prosecuted?

In Arizona, the hand count and the machine count lined up well within the margin of error.

Every recount or audit of any election has shown that the machine count and the hand count match.

Knowing this, what would be gained from an outside forensic of the machines if the results from the different methods of counting are the same?

[Smyrna]

@Jezcoe

In Arizona, the hand count and the machine count lined up well within the margin of error.

Every recount or audit of any election has shown that the machine count and the hand count match.

Knowing this, what would be gained from an outside forensic of the machines if the results from the different methods of counting are the same?

You can count a fraudulent mistake as many times as you want but that doesn’t change the fraud.

[Jezcoe]

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

In Arizona, the hand count and the machine count lined up well within the margin of error.

Every recount or audit of any election has shown that the machine count and the hand count match.

Knowing this, what would be gained from an outside forensic of the machines if the results from the different methods of counting are the same?

You can count a fraudulent mistake as many times as you want but that doesn’t change the fraud.

There are physical hand marked paper ballots that are counted by hand.

That hand recount matches up with the machine count of those same hand marked ballots.

Is there any indication that the ballots are fake?

[Smyrna]

@Jezcoe

There are physical hand marked paper ballots that are counted by hand.

That hand recount matches up with the machine count of those same hand marked ballots.

Is there any indication that the ballots are fake?

…and that’s why there’s a forensic audit going on in Arizona to determine that.

[Jezcoe]

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

There are physical hand marked paper ballots that are counted by hand.

That hand recount matches up with the machine count of those same hand marked ballots.

Is there any indication that the ballots are fake?

…and that’s why there’s a forensic audit going on in Arizona to determine that.

That is not why the forensic audit is going on.

The Cyber Ninjas are not honest actors in this.

They have missed the deadline to answer to Congress as to how they are conducting their audit.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/567208-arizona-audit-contractor-misses-congressional-deadline-to-provide

[Smyrna]

@Jezcoe

That is not why the forensic audit is going on.

The Cyber Ninjas are not honest actors in this.

They have missed the deadline to answer to Congress as to how they are conducting their audit.

K…I can wait…I’m used to it. We’re waiting on the FBI to finish their investigation on Hunter’s laptop. We’re waiting on Durham? We waited on Huber? All “we” do is wait…

[JayJay]

@Piper

@JayJay

The did no such thing, and then gave the ridiculous excuse that there was a “poison pill” in the data that made it useless to them.

LOL you can probably show us where that happened.

It would be better if you actually showed us where Lindell actually presented his “irrefutable proof” during the three day conference.

In the meantime…

MyPillow Guy’s ‘Cyber Expert’ Admits They Have No Proof of Election Hack

According to Merritt, that’s because there was nothing to reveal. The “packet captures are unrecoverable in the data” and “the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyberincursion by China,” he told the Times .

I know it’s hard to admit you got played, but once you realize and admit that you did…it will be much easier to avoid getting played the next time.

[GrandWazoo]

@JayJay

I know it’s hard to admit you got played, but once you realize and admit that you did…it will be much easier to avoid getting played the next time.

For nine months we have heard “there is evidence”. Then there were the court cases where the Trump campaign Lawyers said, “there is evidence”. And when they were asked to produce the evidence, in every case they could not. And then we heard “the Judge’s are not fair because they would not look at the evidence”. And now we again are hearing that because a handful of “experts” are saying “there is evidence” the gas pedal on the clown car gets stomped to the floor board.

[CanadianJudo]

@Smyrna

I’m looking forward to the Dominion lawsuit where Lindell can then deposition information that’s potentially being hidden and “we” can get all of this out in the open.

simply because you have power of deposition doesn’t mean you can ask any question you like.

[Dem]

@rp5x5

A mock election showed how the hacking was done. They did it in real time.

The mock election meant to show how the hacking was done from China? The one that promised Dominion, and other election machines, but instead had a Canon document scanner? lol.

@rp5x5

The data screen showing how machines were on line and points where vote data was changed.

What data screen? Was this when they were fishing through logs they had never seen before? You could tell they were confused and had no Idea what they were looking at.

@rp5x5

The correct vote count

A powerpoint slide showing to sets of numbers is not evidence.

@rp5x5

The constant hack attempts and attacks from fruitcakes.

Not evidence of fraud from an election. Just evidence of incompetent IT folk.

@rp5x5

The illegal behavior against the whistleblower by corrupted officials. The crazed raids.

Not evidence.

The whole point of the symposium, was to go over the packet captures, that was going to blow the whole lid wide open. Yet, those were never presented.

To quote the IT expert hired by Lindell; “We were handed a turd”

[Bigjohn]

Yup that will be a good show and would put the issue to bed once and for all regardless of which side wins.

[enki]

@Bigjohn

Yup that will be a good show and would put the issue to bed once and for all regardless of which side wins.

No. It really won’t.

[Chris]

@Smyrna

@PurpnGold

Huh?

That doesn’t answer my question.

If the machines where never forensically examined (you claim), then Lindell has bogus data, right?

The machines were never forensically examined by a legal source that is scrutinized for accuracy that could be used in a court of law. The Arizona audit is the first and is initiating this same type of audit in other states. If they find nothing, I can live with that. If they find fraud, then how massive, did it change the outcome, who is behind it and when will they be prosecuted?

Maricopa County, AZ already had a ‘forensic’ audit done in regards to the machines with certified election auditors earlier this year. Nothing was found wrong with the machines and equipment within this county. Link

There wasn’t election fraud within Maricopa County during the 2020 election.
Maricopa County had a fair and honest election during the 2020 election. In Maricopa County, the Republicans won five of the six countywide seats here. But Trump didn’t win Maricopa County. We know why Trump didn’t win Maricopa County in 2020.

The other Arizona election audit