So what was your favorite piece of incontrovertible and concrete evidence from the symposium?

Watch it again. Look at the data screens. Listen to the representatives.

1 Like

What is in the data screens that prove Lindell’s case?

That is a leftist lie. That lie was smashed the very next day.

They never presented the data that was promised.

Who is Johnson? LOLOLOL

They absolutely did. Let go of the Chinese masters and the rest of the commie trash and open your eyes.

1 Like

Of course the offer was off the table at the end of the symposium which was Lindell’s offer.

No they didn’t.

Lindell promised to give over the packet captures that would prove his case.

He didn’t do it.

It is because all of it was made up by long term grifter Dennis Montgomery

They never handed over the data so there was nothing to disprove.

That’s what they did for three days. That was the reason for the symposium and the ā€œrepresentativesā€ being there from all 50 states. They left there with a plan for an audit in their states. They have a plan and help from the professionals.

Nonsense. Stop grasping at straws.

Watch it on a large screen. Read it and listen. Phone people can’t see or hear anything

So should we expect a ā€œlegitimateā€ news source like foxsnooz to be all over this?

1 Like

What does that have to do with anything?

Eventually they will have no choice, every Soros and Chinese dollar they accept, will be proof of their complicity and treason.

Big media is corrupted. some are cowards, but will come around.

1 Like

Denial is the go-to ego defense mechanism of Trumpers.

Followed closely by projection.

I watched a good chunk of it.

They never brought any of the data that they promised to light.

The people who were invited thereto look at the data say that they never saw it.

Here is a clip to watch and you can see Lindell make excuses as to why he didn’t hand over the data.

https://twitter.com/donie/status/1425992277244235781

1 Like

I keep noticing how the question as to what is in the data that proves their case keeps getting avoided.

No sense in explaining it to people with no eyes or ears.

1 Like

Is it that maybe there is no proof and this is all a fake it until you make it tactic?

I think so.

It should be super easy to point out where in the data that the case is made.