So what was your favorite piece of incontrovertible and concrete evidence from the symposium?
rp5x5
632
Watch it again. Look at the data screens. Listen to the representatives.
1 Like
Jezcoe
633
What is in the data screens that prove Lindellās case?
Piper
634
That is a leftist lie. That lie was smashed the very next day.
Jezcoe
635
They never presented the data that was promised.
rp5x5
637
They absolutely did. Let go of the Chinese masters and the rest of the commie trash and open your eyes.
1 Like
Piper
638
Of course the offer was off the table at the end of the symposium which was Lindellās offer.
Jezcoe
639
No they didnāt.
Lindell promised to give over the packet captures that would prove his case.
He didnāt do it.
It is because all of it was made up by long term grifter Dennis Montgomery
Jezcoe
640
They never handed over the data so there was nothing to disprove.
Piper
641
Thatās what they did for three days. That was the reason for the symposium and the ārepresentativesā being there from all 50 states. They left there with a plan for an audit in their states. They have a plan and help from the professionals.
rp5x5
642
Nonsense. Stop grasping at straws.
Watch it on a large screen. Read it and listen. Phone people canāt see or hear anything
So should we expect a ālegitimateā news source like foxsnooz to be all over this?
1 Like
Piper
644
What does that have to do with anything?
rp5x5
645
Eventually they will have no choice, every Soros and Chinese dollar they accept, will be proof of their complicity and treason.
Big media is corrupted. some are cowards, but will come around.
1 Like
Kelby
646
Denial is the go-to ego defense mechanism of Trumpers.
Followed closely by projection.
Jezcoe
647
I watched a good chunk of it.
They never brought any of the data that they promised to light.
The people who were invited thereto look at the data say that they never saw it.
Here is a clip to watch and you can see Lindell make excuses as to why he didnāt hand over the data.
https://twitter.com/donie/status/1425992277244235781
1 Like
Jezcoe
648
I keep noticing how the question as to what is in the data that proves their case keeps getting avoided.
rp5x5
649
No sense in explaining it to people with no eyes or ears.
1 Like
Jezcoe
650
Is it that maybe there is no proof and this is all a fake it until you make it tactic?
I think so.
It should be super easy to point out where in the data that the case is made.