Run. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Like he wouldn’t be seen anywhere he was.
He has said for months that he would be arrested. If he wanted to pull a Hillary he would have cleaned that computer a long time ago.
Apparently your sisters kids are pretty bright and don’t put up with crap.
“Where’s the beef?” is a perfectly reasonable question. IMO, the beef is being processed in a reasonable manner and time frame. If we could spend years on Lewinsky and Benghazi, we can do the same for Russian interference in our national elections. At least in this instance, we are seeing incremental progress.
I’ll pose a question in return: why all the lies? Many if not most of the alleged contacts between Trump associates and Russia would not be considered in and of themselves illegal, AFAIK. From Flynn discussing sanctions, to the Trump Tower meeting, to Manafort providing polling data, to Trump continuing to negotiate the Moscow project - nothing indictable there. So why the unremitting stream of lies?
Imagine investigating, lets say a “major murder crime”, where no one’s been charged, but there’s like 10 indictments of people who were lying about something during the course/process of the investigation…again where no one has even been charged. That’s what you got.
This is called establishing a case. This has the potential to be the highest profile case in American history. If Mueller eventually decides to recommend charges, his evidence needs to be impeccable. That takes time.
A recent example - Kenneth Starr was appointed special counsel in August of 1994. Clinton was impeached December of 1998, over 4 years later. When there’s the possibility of accusing a sitting president of crimes, it takes time.
That’s a problem. Basically, they are acting as if the mandate of the special counsel was to review the Republican campaign and everyone in it and find anything potentially unethical or any crimes that people high up in the campaign may have committed even if they occurred over a decade ago.
With the broad mandate they have used, if they want to pretend to be impartial, it should have included the Democratic campaign, not just the Republican campaign. Then we would see how Steele and Hillary and Podesta might have faired. But then that would take us into their working with Russians and colluding with Strzok and McCabe.
Not about to just say “campaigns” it had to be limited to the Republican campaign.
Why would they ignore crimes or investigations into other crimes if there is strong suspicion? Even if Mueller doesnt do it, it would be handed off to another prosecutor. Which is what happened with Cohen. What, you think if they had suspicion due to evidence uncovered during the investigation that roger stone murdered someone in 1994 that they should just ignore it? So much for “law and order”…
The proper question: who’s stupid enough NOT to believe it? CNN suspected something was going to happen. They’ve had Stone’s house staked out for weeks if not months. Did you listen to Tucker Carlson on Fox, lying that the FBI “had CNN in tow”?