What approach would that be? Requesting someone to back in their assertions?

This is a fundamental component of your argument. Not a rat hole.

Instead of a link, why don’t you describe for me how you think science defines an individual life. Let’s drill down on this topic.

Um the pill does not replace abortions.

And that would be a pill which may or may not be an abortion pill from an illegal source, unless you wish to travel across state lines.

I’m countries where abortion is illegal the pill is the way it’s done.

Safer than a coat hanger.

I already told you.

Look up the biological definition of an organism. And when I told you that, I predicted the basic “show-me-a-link” tolling that you libs do.

It’s basic biology. Junior High biology. I’m not going to supply a link to something you should already know (and that I truly believe you DO already know.)

I submit people would prefer a pill from a legit pharmacy to a round object some illegal source claims is an abortion pill.

You claim they don’t give a rat’s ass.

Which one of us is right?

Not asking for a link anymore. Asking for a description in your own words. If you read the post you quoted, that should be apparent.

If it’s basic junior high biology, surely you could describe it.

What is the “biologic definition” of an individual life?

An organism.

You mean like Terry Schiavo? :thinking:

People tend to prefer not breaking the law, for obvious reasons.

I enjoy how you asking him to provide a link to support his assertion is now “trolling.”

1 Like

If it’s available form a legit pharmacy I would bet most women would prefer that route. If not, they might go with whatever is available.

What world do you live in?

People smoke weed and don’t care if it’s legal or not. Why would an abortion pill be any different?

The fact that you think that to yourself says that doesn’t contradict your beliefs.

Wait, you’re wondering how a puff of weed is different than having an illegal abortion?

And you’re asking me what world I live in?

If a woman doesn’t believe an abortion is wrong they will use the pill. Making abortions illegal won’t end abortions.

At this point overturning RvW won’t make a bit of difference.

But be assured, Republicans won’t let that happen. They don’t want to make abortions illegal because that would take away their best taking point.

How do you define m an organism?

Where then would the rights of a fetus stop?

Would you support a child who was born to a mother who drank while pregnant to then later in life sue the mother for negligence?

The statistics prove you wrong. There are a ■■■■■■■■ of DUI’s given out every year…which would show you that people don’t mind breaking the law if they see a benefit in it for themselves.

Also, prisons are full of those who didn’t mind breaking the law, for what its worth.

It’s Biology 101. Any google search will give you that definition. That’s the definition.

You should have known better than to ask what I have already answered. Ask again, and I’ll give you the same answer.

Interesting:

Just in from Republican senator Collins:

“I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. Wade because that would mean to me that their judicial philosophy did not include a respect for established decisions, established law,”