I responded to your post saying people fall for scams all the time so it is very much on topic :slight_smile:

of course i did. did you see me comment about either? it’s common practice for both parties. what you won’t see from me is the faux outrage you display.

Why is my thread ā€œfaux outrageā€ if i post about a particular incident? Hilarious.

Coolie. So if both sides do it its a ok. Got it.

Wait…

Which is it?

You seem horribly confused.

please link to the outrage you displayed when the dnc did it? how about a link to your saying it was scummy for them? a link to some mild rebuke?

how about just saying both do it all the time and it shouldn’t be this way?

but no, you dismiss the evidence that all are guilty as ā€œwhataboutismā€ and then point out that the story I linked to excused the dnc’s dishonesty with the authors own ā€œwhataboutismā€, which of course you jumped on to dismiss it yourself.

the irony be thick here.

2 Likes

and yet you only display outrage at one… odd that.

confused is the normal state of mind for liberals

1 Like

Hokay since i gotta spell it out to ya.

  1. Poster cant believe anyone would fall for this.
  2. I point out people fall for scams all the time, therefore it is not hard to believe people would fall for this.
  3. Another poster pretends my pointing this out is ā€œfaux outrageā€ because i didnt feel like i have to preface every single post with bothsides
  4. You seem confused.

Im not going to play your tu quoque game. Every single thread you guys do this so i never take you guys seriously.

I dont owe you anything. Your desperation is cute though. The irony be thick because your very own link shows the same kind of letter coming from the RNC.

Right. That’s me.

There’s your disconnect.

This isn’t a scam.

It would take a special kind of stupid to look at this mailer and conclude it’s the census. And even more stupid to conclude that the census requires someone to send in money to the RNC.

That wasn’t me, but I agree it is. It’s faux because you insist this is a scam.

Well, you can say whatever you want, but given your demonstrated judgment that this is a scam, I can’t place any value in your other judgments.

Shrug.

So because you cant believe anyone falling for this, it isnt a scam and neither is Ben’s example? Curious logic… as to your final post i can only shrug because your devotion to twump speaks volumes.

Please keep up.

Nobody will fall for it because it’s not a scam. Your ā€œbecauseā€ is misplaced. Don’t make up stuff and assign it to me.

I said nothing about Ben’s example, so, again, it’s your fabrication to apply anything about that to me.

You made that up too.

Please, if you intend to engage me, do so with honesty.

And as I pointed out very early in the thread they have also sent out fundraisers disguised as survey’s.

Sure, relatively wealthy older men.

Do the people making those calls disclose they aren’t the US government? Because the fund raising letter in question did on the third line of the first page, in large print.

I did until you pulled a rather childish stunt in another thread saying my rewording of TDS to trump devotion syndrome was standing up and accepting the label. Engaging civilly requires both sides to agree to civil discourse but in this case a jab for a jab, tit for tat :D.

Which of course is precisely why I chose that source and not one that only showed ā€œoutrageā€ toward one party.

Who said you owed me anything? or is that just your way of saying you will continue the selective faux outrage toward the rnc while dismissing that of the dnc? What is so hard about saying neither should do it?

I really did get a kick out of you throwing the ā€œwhataboutismā€ kanard at me when i dismissed niether, and the defending your position by pointing out the link shows the rnc did it too! That one will keep in stitches for hours!

quid pro joe!