Republicans approve bill to protect same-sex marriage . . . give finger to Constitution and federalism

[STODR]

The supreme court hasn’t ruled yet.

[STODR]

You asked how it could possibly affect someone else. I answered.

[johnwk2]

@fallenturtle

@johnwk2

I see you are still projecting in order to deflect. In addition, regardless of political party affiliation, every individual who holds a federal office of public trust ought to be more than censured for assisting in the subjugation of our Constitution and federalism. Our forefathers knew how to treat their oppressors:
.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their worst nightmare.

Isn’t that torture?

It is justice being dealt out in payment for the torture inflicted upon our forefathers by a despotic, lawless and thieving government.

JWK

“To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation.”____ Savings and Loan Association v.Topeka,(1875).[/i][/b]

[johnwk2]

@moonshine

why would you (or any conservative) care if 2 gays get married or not. It has zero effect on your life. I just dont get why it should matter to you at all. No one is forcing you to get gay married. 2 people getting married has zero effect on your life. so why do you care?

What I care about is the rule of law not being followed. Did you miss the title of the thread? I suspect you didn’t miss the title and prefer to avoid that conversation.

JWK

What makes a Supreme Court opinion legitimate is when it is in harmony with the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.
.

[moonshine]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

[johnwk2]

Is there some reason for you responding with that to what you quoted from me? Please explain.

[fallenturtle]

@johnwk2

@fallenturtle

@johnwk2

I see you are still projecting in order to deflect. In addition, regardless of political party affiliation, every individual who holds a federal office of public trust ought to be more than censured for assisting in the subjugation of our Constitution and federalism. Our forefathers knew how to treat their oppressors:
.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their worst nightmare.

Isn’t that torture?

It is justice being dealt out in payment for the torture inflicted upon our forefathers by a despotic, lawless and thieving government.

JWK

So you think we should bring back tar and feathering, a form of torture?

[johnwk2]

Well, moonshine, why did you post that portion of the 14th Amendment and highlight what you did?

JWK

Is the “big guy” (Joey open-borders Biden) getting 10% of the profits Mexico’s government is getting for assisting Mexico’s cartels in their drug and human trafficking across our border?

[Roxiebelle]

Name on thing she said that was wrong or offer a different opinion up for discussion.

[johnwk2]

@Roxiebelle

Name one thing she said that was wrong or offer a different opinion up for discussion.

Now that’s a fair request.

Hey Nemesis, how about naming one thing the lady said in the VIDEO that was wrong.

JWK

Is the “big guy” (Joey open-border Biden) getting 10% of the profits Mexico’s government is getting for assisting Mexico’s cartels in their drug and human trafficking across our border?

[Nemesis]

@Roxiebelle

Name on thing she said that was wrong or offer a different opinion up for discussion.

Her whole argument was wrong but I digress. The point I was making is that John said it was a shocking critique so I watched it expecting to hear something different but it just parroted everything he has said a thousand times before on this forum.

[Publius]

@Nemesis

@Roxiebelle

Name on thing she said that was wrong or offer a different opinion up for discussion.

Her whole argument was wrong but I digress. The point I was making is that John said it was a shocking critique so I watched it expecting to hear something different but it just parroted everything he has said a thousand times before on this forum.

By “said,” I presume you mean “regurgibleated”?

[YOSUP]

@johnwk2

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-passes-bill-to-protect-same-sex-marriage-measure-now-goes-to-biden-live-updates/ar-AA153ann?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=fbf6201742bb418eab4a04225acb40df

Bill passes with Republican support: It passed the Senate 61 to 36 in November with a dozen Republicans in support. On Thursday, dozens of Republican House members voted in support of the bill.

Once again, our spineless Republican Congress critters ignore our Constitution’s Tenth Amendment and its protection of federalism, our big tent system, and they agree to take a ■■■■ on our Constitution.

Keep in mind the succinct description of federalism as found in Federalist Paper No. 45

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.

The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."

JWK

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.___ Tenth Amendment

I could care less about this, how does it fix the economy?

[Roxiebelle]

Typical lib drive by response, you didn’t point out one thing that was wrong or offer a different opinion on anything.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

There is a thread on this forum addressing every one of her talking points. If you are that starved for debate and discussion, go visit 'em

[johnwk2]

@Supreme_War_Pig

There is a thread on this forum addressing every one of her talking points. If you are that starved for debate and discussion, go visit 'em

Major deflection alert!

Instead of beating around the bush and deflecting, how about naming one thing the lady said in the VIDEO that not accurate. Seems to me you are all wind and no sail.

JWK

Is the “big guy” (Joey open-border Biden) getting 10% of the profits Mexico’s government is getting for assisting Mexico’s cartels in their drug and human trafficking across our border?

[JayJay]

All of it.

[JayJay]

The video itself was the deflection.

It has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.

The Constitution is plain that Congress had the power to pass this law.

If you think differently, encourage someone with standing to sue.

[JayJay]

Although…the video does show what many conservatives are actually angry about re: the same sex marriage law.

It ain’t about the Constitution…that’s just cover.

[johnwk2]

Seems to me you have just confirmed you can’t articulate one thing the lady said in the VIDEO that is not accurate.

JWK

Is the “big guy” (Joey open-border Biden) getting 10% of the profits Mexico’s government is getting for assisting Mexico’s cartels in their drug and human trafficking across our border?