they are meant to re-establish the proper perspective for you, away from the narrow sighted narratives that shape everyone’s perspective
i’m aware of this narrative but i do understand you have to restate it.
they are meant to re-establish the proper perspective for you, away from the narrow sighted narratives that shape everyone’s perspective
i’m aware of this narrative but i do understand you have to restate it.
haha
yeah, the trump voters are the ones who obsessed over those huh?
i know i know another “single question”
Englishmen have a different “sense of humor”. Mean twits wouldn’t bother them.
She will be the first Mexican-born congresswoman in U.S. history.
First Republican as well as the first woman elected from the Lower Rio Grande Valley.
The price of mules has gone up 18.4% since 2020.
Where were the mules?!?!?!?!
Historic win though - good for her. Exciting to see on a number of levels.
I think Presidential tweets, press conferences, media statements etc are worthy of discussion.
Trump just tweeted so voraciously he gave a lot of fodder for discussions. Not sure why that is so hard to grasp.
But this thread is about Mayra Flores not Trump.
Back on topic I think its great she won. Hopefully she will be a great representative for the people in her district.
I knew nothing about Flores until this thread so I did some research. Apparently the dems decided to spend pretty much zero on a seat that is back up for grabs in November. Flores spent just over $1 mill.
But kudos to her on winning. She now has 4-5 months to solidify her position with voters to show she deserves a full term
That district is actually going away in November due to redistricting… new district that she’ll be competing at will be way tougher to win.
Hard to argue these days that GOP is a party exclusively for old white men when they just won a district that’s 11 % white
First Congresswoman born in Mexico?
HISTORIC!
With a border patrol husband I agree this is historic.
Latino’s resonate with Republicans culturally
I did not know that. Makes even more sense why dems did not spend more.
Looks like a tactical decision rather than them assuming they would win.
Trump just tweeted so voraciously he gave a lot of fodder for discussions. Not sure why that is so hard to grasp.
as though biden doesnt with all the endless stupid ■■■■ he mumbles, confuses, shouts, lies, etc
but yeah back to the discussion
Nemesis:Trump just tweeted so voraciously he gave a lot of fodder for discussions. Not sure why that is so hard to grasp.
as though biden doesnt with all the endless stupid ■■■■ he mumbles, confuses, shouts, lies, etc
but yeah back to the discussion
Then start threads on what he says. Discuss away to your hearts content.
Hard to argue these days that GOP is a party exclusively for old white men when they just won a district that’s 11 % white
Wonder what the turn out was and the breakdown of voters.
But regardless no politician should take someones vote for granted. They should have to work tirelessly for each and every vote.
They’re trying to district her out. Don’t let them Mamita!
Nemesis:But if the dems could steal a general election what stopped them from stealing this vote?
In fact if the deep state was so successful in stealing the 2020 election on an unprecedented scale then we should see Democrat majoritys in the House and Senate come November.
I have always found this comical. If there was such widespread fraud why don’t the Dems have 60 votes in the Senate and a lot more votes in the House?
Could it be there was no widespread significant voter fraud? And, the illegal and significant voting fraud was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election?
PAmoderate37: Nemesis:But if the dems could steal a general election what stopped them from stealing this vote?
In fact if the deep state was so successful in stealing the 2020 election on an unprecedented scale then we should see Democrat majoritys in the House and Senate come November.
I have always found this comical. If there was such widespread fraud why don’t the Dems have 60 votes in the Senate and a lot more votes in the House?
Could it be there was no widespread significant voter fraud? And, the illegal and significant voting fraud was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election?
But there is no evidence of voter fraud. Every legal challenge concluded that.
Even just in battleground states the infrastructure to carry this out would have to be massive and involve people at every level.
Someone by now would have said something.
PAmoderate37: Nemesis:But if the dems could steal a general election what stopped them from stealing this vote?
In fact if the deep state was so successful in stealing the 2020 election on an unprecedented scale then we should see Democrat majoritys in the House and Senate come November.
I have always found this comical. If there was such widespread fraud why don’t the Dems have 60 votes in the Senate and a lot more votes in the House?
Could it be there was no widespread significant voter fraud? And, the illegal and significant voting fraud was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election?
Which still doesn’t explain gop votes down ballot from trump so it couldn’t be. But you keep fighting that good fight!
They signed affidavits! Those have been forgotten though. Literally nobody wonders why
But there is no evidence of voter fraud. Every legal challenge concluded that.
I’m not a “Stop the Steal” guy, but that’s not accurate.