https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1103388695976120320
These are real class acts, huh?
Good guys with guns?
This is essentially what Westboro does.
And the GOP (and the country) sinks lower and lower and lower.
Fat donaldâs GOP in full display.
1 Like
You know, I read the headline and thought âThis is surely making something out of nothing because some republican women decided to wear their nice outfitsâ.
Then I saw the men did it.
I donât think I can say what I want to without earning a ban.
13 Likes
Now for rest of the story.
Rep. David Welch, R-Kingston and Scott Wallace, R-Danville wore pearl necklaces â a token from the Womenâs Defense League of New Hampshire (WDLNH), an organization that fights for Second Amendment rights and opposes HB 687.
âThey gave them out to a whole bunch of us,â Welch, who opposes the bill, told the Union Leader .
And in case anyone wonders Woman Defense LeagueâŚitâs about powering women.
Seems to meâŚlibs have a problem with that.
Why?
1 Like
I canât believe I used to vote for this party.
1 Like
Maybe libs should learn when their masters lie to emâŚand stop believing the BS they feed em.
âYears ago, for a hearing on constitutional carry [carrying a gun without a permit], members of our organization showed up in professional clothing and three happened to be wearing pearls,â Morin tells Yahoo Lifestyle. âA member of Moms Demand claimed she didnât testify because she felt like she was in front of a firing squad. We donât know why she said that. Ever since weâve worn the pearls at hearings.â
Morin adds: âWeâre just moms testifying on different sides of the issue. No one was âclutching pearls.'â
The Womenâs Defense League website called HB 687 âthe most destructive piece of legislationâ in modern history: âThe rights of law-abiding gun owners across the state can be stripped away by an angry ex-husband or wife; a psychopathic ex-roommate; a pissed off Mother-in-Law; an abusive boyfriend OR the police can file a petition on ANYONE at ANY TIME.â
Just maybe they wonât come off as so hysterical.
1 Like
Why did they wear them to THIS meeting? Just telegraphing to the citizens that theyâre not going to listen at all.
And the rest of the rest of the story. It was to mock women. Why do Râs hate women?
From the Washington Post link:
Images from the statehouse â where legislators were considering arguments over a bill that would make it easier to take guns away from potentially dangerous people â caromed across social media as critics lobbed accusations of sexism and insensitivity at the necklace-wearing men.
The implication was clear, they said: These politicians thought gun-control activists were âclutching their pearlsâ in overwrought and self-righteous outrage â and, specifically, female outrage.
Pearl necklace? They get too close to ZZ Top?
1 Like
Washington Compost 
I donât trust that guy in the picture, not enough medals.
1 Like
It had much more accurate and relevant information. Why is that a problem?
RightâŚthe compost made no mention that Women defense league gave them the pearls to wear.
Just more of left-wing propaganda that compost spouts off with lies and manipulating of facts to get there sheep all riled up.
And it worked.
2 Likes
From the post:
Online, members of the Womenâs Defense League of New Hampshire, a pro-guns organization, have said Watts and other Moms Demand Action members have it all wrong: the pearls symbolize opposition to the bill itself and support for the Second Amendment and the Womenâs Defense League â support for women, not denigration of them.
âThe PEARLS are in support of the Womenâs Defense League. Women who ACTUALLY PROMOTE GUN SAFETY and WOMENâS RIGHTS,â tweeted Kimberly Morin, president of the group.
Morin told a local newspaper that theyâve been wearing pearls for this reason since 2016. She accused Watts, who lives in Colorado, of being an out-of-state âpaid hackâ who is lobbying for gun control legislation from afar and whose group doesnât understand local politics. In a day-long Twitter offensive, Morin also called the Moms Demand Action volunteers âharpies,â a reference to a creature from Greek mythology that had the body of a bird and the head of a human woman.
Nowhere in your quote do I see where they gave em out.
âThey gave them out to a whole bunch of us,â Welch, who opposes the bill, told the Union Leader .
Everything else you posted is nothing but emotional opinion of of left-wing propaganda site.
No one is buying the garbage excuse they scrambled to come up with once they realized they were being brutally, and rightfully so, savagely attacked for their cruelty here.
Men wore pearl necklaces because a group of pro-2A women also wear them. 
Get outta here with that nonsense. Iâm about as pro-2A as anyone else here, but what these MEN did was disgusting and just another example that the cruelty is the point. The GOP is dead to me.
5 Likes
Why is it important to include that they were given them as opposed to just saying what they mean and who is behind them?
Keep clutching those fake pearls libs.
At least those repubs were men enough to make fun of those womenâs dead relatives to their faces I suppose.
2 Likes
