we have seen part of the truth, in a court setting the standard is reasonable doubt. I listened to Strzok testify. He was more credible than Hillary. I know that is a low bar.
you should focus on the text that said Trump would be the most destabilizing president in history. coming from a counterintelligence guy that is scary in its implications.
The national security state is alive and well. These guys measure threats and work to minimize them, I do not believe personal animus is in their calculations. They are too cold blooded for that.
they were not against Trump personally, they were against his policies in my opinion.