If you protest against them, they will seize everything you have.

But don’t worry, you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy. Meanwhile billionaires continue to rake in more billions.

2 Likes

You take out the “uh” crutches and that sounds like a monologue out of a dystopian movie or novel.

1 Like

We are next.

Yes, things are getting pretty bad when movie plots and wild conspiracy theories start to become reality.

4 Likes

Yes. The White House is supporting the oppression in Canada instead of opposing it.

Canada appears to be the test case for what is likely to happen here.

1 Like

You really need to stop getting your news from rebel.

1 Like

Yes. Only state-controlled media are allowed.

The Canadian versions of Pravda and Izvestia are the oracles of truth.

5 Likes

In that case I’ll sign up. You are an F6 source.

5 Likes

There are lots of good private news networks in Canada that don’t push fake false flags terrorist attack for clicks.

F6 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

4 Likes

And they are all funded by the government. Government funding equals government control.

Rebel News is a rare exception.

1 Like

except it doesn’t.
Canada need to protect itself from American every growing grasp of moronicness.

1 Like

So even though Chrystia Freeland is there and is saying exactly what the thread OP says she is saying, you are going to pretend some wild conspiracy theorist made it up.

Man oh man… if that’s not fall-in-your-sword loyalty to the leftist authoritarian ideology … nothing is.

5 Likes

Yes, the pretext of maintaining Canadian independence is the basis for the funding.

The reality is that Trudeau appears to be a puppet of Washington. Biden gave the order to end the trucker protest using federal authority, and Trudeau responded with the unprecedented state of emergency.

Canada appears to be a test case for what will happen in the US.

1 Like

Good points.

It will be interesting to hear an explanation about how Freeland can be Deputy Prime Minister and on the Board of Directors of WEF without a conflict of interest.

I also find this statement from the WEF bio to be very ironic:

. . . she was a leading advocate for democracy, human rights, and multilateralism around the world.

Progs make up their own lexicon so that they can say one thing but mean another. Who the hell knows what she thinks “democracy” and “human rights” mean.

E.g. they are now saying “woman” when its really a man.

1 Like

I though Trudeau was a puppet of the World Economic Forum.

maybe you should listen to the whole press event in context.

the act used to freeze fund has nothing to do with the emergency powers act.
she want to expand the criminal financing act.

Why? Does she retract what she said?

Parsing won’t help you. She’s advocating going full blown totalitarian … regardless of the name of the act or law.

1 Like