It was a response to your post specifically about a response to the January 6th Commission.
WW
Maybe that would help. But i see Soros money buying the election of some pretty useless and corrupt state AGs.
A multipartisan/nonpaetisan panel of judges would seem to me to have more checks and balances agsinst hijacking of hearings.
zantax
23
There just isnât any such thing as non partisan. Sorry.
Thatâs why I included multipartisan. As in various stakeholders nominate their preferred judge/s to sit on the commission. That would make it hard/er for a few commissioners to bury an unconfessed crime by one of their âfavoured team membersâ, revealed by one of the conscience-clearers.
zantax
25
How would that differ from congress which is a multi partisan entity currently tasked with oversight? Seems the only difference would be, they arenât elected. I canât see how removing voter oversight would be a plus.
The foxes are presently policing the foxes. How does that have integrity? Hence the continuing corruption which remains unhealed.
zantax
27
Well, I have long said, the major flaw in the countries governing scheme is that the fed, foxes if you will, are the guardians of the henhouse. As in, the only thing checking federal power are federal institutions. At least since the seventeenth was repealed. Maybe just reverse that instead.
Camp
28
Calling for a MINISTRY of truth?
That would make the transition from free press to government propaganda complete.
Count me out.
1 Like
How would having a regular truth commission affect the press?
The press would cover the commissionâs deliberations and testimony to expose malfeasance in federal government.
Camp
31
That would be a government clearing house of information that would cause governing individuals to shut up and point to it for anything even remotely controversial.
It would not be good.
We want these idiots to free lance and reveal the truth behind the official script.
This paragraph doesnât make any sense to me. Does it need editing?
Camp
33
It simply means that (government) people would be afraid to talk and run counter to an âofficialâ position.
That was not the case in other truth commissions. Why would the US be different?
Camp
35
I disagree. Too subjective and distracting.