Red wave to pink foam

What does voting for a guy who has been taking a portion of the money given to his son by other countries with the purpose of bribing his influence, all while 51 retired intelligence officers and the FBI declare that the evidence proving this is Russian disinformation, say about the present state of our country? Look around you my friend with both eyes open, not just one. “We” have some serious problems.

1 Like

It says, “But what about the people I DON’T fawn over!!”

:wink:

1 Like

He’s talking about congressional oversight of the DOJ. That’s not something you can hand over to the DOJ.
Your response might be more reasonable related to an investigation of Hunter…which IMO not many are going to care about, regardless of what he did.

It kind of solves the mystery of Fetterman being elected too. :crazy_face:

1 Like

Sometimes, you just gotta retard your mental faculties for the sake of the cause. :wink:

2 Likes

That’s quite the assumption that they had them in the first place. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

Bad Smyrna. Different thread. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

Hmm apparently we are talking about different things.

I meant that Congressional hearings can be used to investigate things the DoJ might not do well for reasons of political bias.

EX:

  • When Hillary said the 2016 election was a fraud. (and Steele dossier)
  • When DoJ gave Hillary a pass on her secret email server and her stealing of government documents.
  • When Trump said the 2020 election was a fraud.
  • When DoJ allegedly targeted Trump unfairly at Mar el Lago for keeping government documents.

When used legitimately such hearings are actual hearings. The Senators are learning new facts for the first time . . . not staging a government-funded propaganda campaign to persuade voters.

Depending on their findings they may decide “DoJ cannot be trusted to investigate this matter fairly” and recommend an independent investigation.

that doesn’t answer my question.

Is it normal for conservatives to cheer on congress using the power and force of the government to investigate a private citizen?

Your question was small, overlooking the big picture…and that’s my point. “We” have serious issues confronting us from within our nation that many, like yourself, are either ignoring or naive to?

1 Like

We are discussing the current mid term election.

Biden said yesterday good luck to the repubics who are ■■■■■■■ around eith his son. I don’t think is gonna happen. Dims will probably maintain control the house and senate. The fix is in.

Well, move the clock ahead. The communists and socialist punked America.

Can only be failed :joy:

If that private citizen has connections with the most powerful politician in the country, who also is the “boss” of the DOJ, and those dealings have to do with foreign unfriendly powers, then it would be mandatory to review that the DOJ is following proper investigatory procedures. It’s called oversight.

2 Likes

Unless his Ol Joey got paid either as VP or POTUS in exchange for foreign access to the WH or policy influence. :face_with_raised_eyebrow: Big no no

Reason and logic entering the conversation.

Where was this with regards to Jarod Kushner? He fits that description to a tee

1 Like

■■■■■■■ now thinks he has some kind of mandate on Corporations?

He’s targeted oil companies and now wants to ■■■■ with Elon Musk?
This should get interesting

2 Likes

Yeah you can really feel the mirth.

1 Like