Five bucks says Republican Media will talk about a movie today instead of the men, women and children who were gunned down recently (and how to stop the next one).
He’s just trying to milk it for some reason.
You support a silver spooned New York City brat and have the audacity to post THAT??
1 Like
The more I think about it, the more I think that conservatives should love this movie. It’s like a dramatization of a Q post - it’s the same fantasies I see conservatives posting about all the time.
The evil liberal elitists, with all their money and power and elitism, are engaged in a massive conspiracy to murder good, salt-of-the-earth “deplorables” for sport. Because they’re evil and elitist.
But they didn’t expect those plucky Trunp supporters to fight back, with their pluckiness and salt-of-the-earth-ness!
All it needs is some vague mention of pedophilia.
1 Like
DOLOOP
115
You could save yourself some time and watch “The Simple Life.” I think there’s probably several seasons of it. Wasn’t my thing, but it sounds like pretty much exactly what you’re looking for.
George Clooney was on a chain gang in his early years. Sure, he escaped, but it did give him a bit of humility.
4 Likes
conan
117
Yeah yeah yeah…I can see now. Hollywood snobs have lots in common with wielders/iron workers/carpenters/machinist etc.
conan
119
I support him because he driving libs over the edge.
conan
121
Libs tears give me great joy.
Bottoms up!
May the winds of fortune sail you,
May you sail a gentle sea.
May it always be the other guy
Who says, “this drink’s on me".
You mean like “Son-in-Law”?
That’s weird, but not particularly surprising to me.
Yeah but who’s enjoying tears in this thread, con? Lolz.
Cynic
127
Saw the trailer, which is clearly anti “elitist” or implied liberals.
Has the elite liberals depicted as the antagonists and cold blooded murderers, and what appeared to be “southern” citizens as the victims and ultimately the protagonists.
Who made this anti-liberal film? I did not look that up.
Cynic
129
Watched the trailer again, pretty sick in how they depict the “elitists”. Clearly meant to portray the people being hunted as the good guys and “liberals” as demented murderers.
But it is just a movie so meh…
This could be marketable. I’m trying to cry on cue to get a pint or 2.
FWIW, I think a movie that puts a target on members of either political party is a bad idea. I realize that it’s art not real life but still I think it set a bad example. I also don’t like movies that show US monuments or the White House getting destroyed or blown up.
And the heavy handed political message in Avatar was a distraction from a visually stunning movie. I felt like “How to Train Your Dragon” was the same story as Avatar only better written.
And even though I’m citing a kid’s movie as a good example, I’m not opposed to violence in film. Hereditary, for example, was a great movie–even though it was horrific and disturbing.
The movie producer is LOVING the free publicity from Fox News an the social media buzz today.
1 Like
“Apparently so. That was the original title of a movie that is STILL set to be released.”
You’re asking if it’s okay to do what’s in movies?
No. Don’t do what’s in movies most of the time, good thing to remember.
Cynic
139
Can only assume the OP thought Silence of the Lambs was about a misunderstood Hannibal Lecter and promoted cannibalism.
1 Like
