i didnt say that. he might be. but i doubt it. either way theres no proof of it here.

and again, you cant prove your case with a negative

it was either racially motivated or not

painting the narrative with nuanced shades doesnt prove jack

What would you consider proof?

any indication that he thought they were guilty because of their race

otherwise it’s just a narrative. like say, the one at Oberlin college where the students were sure the owner of the bakery went after the thief because he was black and so went on a crusade to ruin his livelihood

this isn’t a court of law. This is the court of public opinion.

You don’t think blacks new about that in 2016? What is different in 2020?

1 Like

lol of course. let the colbert and the view watchers decide

ha. good one

1 Like

When he asked “what do you have to lose?”, well that was answered.

It sort of does. It’s a dot among other dots on a track record. How to interpret the dots is up to the viewer. But there’s more than one dot.

Well no, it definitely happened.

Isnt it binary? Charleston shooter for instance. Could we have said he was racist for shooting up a church? I think what showed his racism was the fact of his Facebook posts.

yeah a “dot” from the early mid 70’s, then a “dot” in 1989…

with a lot of involvement in the black community in between

ridiculous narrative bs

Not the full story, not all black people

Were the four black people and four Latino people on the jury who found them guilty racists too?

…thank you for so succinctly demonstrating my point.

Racism is not a binary state.

You guys approach racism as if there are only two options - either you’re a KKK member, or you’re safe.

That’s not how it works.

So the nine minorities on the jury were or weren’t racists when they found them guilty?

1 Like

So you honestly believe blacks are seriously paying attention to something that happened back in the 70’s? Seriously?

I don’t disagree that Trump will be lucky to duplicate his results with the black voters in 2020, but I seriously doubt the incident referenced in your OP will be a factor one way or the other.

I don’t know why this is so hard for you to understand.

Whether they were “racist” or not is not the simple binary that you pretend it is.

They found them guilty based on coerced , false, confessions. Had nothing to do with race.

1989

And yes. Watch “When they see us” and you will get the picture.