ouch!
Ahhh…
EXAMPLES PROVIDED:
ME 1
CANADIAN 0
CanadianJudo: Call_me_Ishmael:You tell me. I added a video to my post above . There is a video that MSNBC didnt show you.
a video of one rabndom crime your using to generalize all black people with.
Ahhh…
EXAMPLES PROVIDED:
ME 1
CANADIAN 0
You didn’t prove any examples why blacks are sentence to longer jail time for similar crimes.
your posted a random video of a single case to generalize millions of people into being violent thugs.
You guys and your race threads. Bless your damn hearts.
you guys and your race wars…
You think Biden has read that or has any intention of doing any of it?
You think Biden has read that or has any intention of doing any of it?
unlike the current President I bet Biden can in fact read.
And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
What i posted indicates that the “crime” has degrees of viciousness and depravity that are not part of the charge or conviction. The animal who punched the old lady was charged with assault. A man who punches his physical equal is charged with assault.
The two “assaults” are in no way equal in depravity and viciousness.
so black are more violent by nature, is that what your suggesting.
Did he say that? Because if he didn’t, it’s baiting.
And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
I don’t need to prove a negative that isn’t how debating works.
CanadianJudo:so black are more violent by nature, is that what your suggesting.
Did he say that? Because if he didn’t, it’s baiting.
I asked a question, he responded by suggesting black criminal are more violent and posted a video of a black man beating up an old woman.
WuWei:You think Biden has read that or has any intention of doing any of it?
unlike the current President I bet Biden can in fact read.
The current President is not under discussion.
CanadianJudo: Call_me_Ishmael:And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
I don’t need to prove a negative that isn’t how debating works.
thats not proving a negative!
lol good grief
I don’t need to prove his generalization is not correct.
WuWei: CanadianJudo:so black are more violent by nature, is that what your suggesting.
Did he say that? Because if he didn’t, it’s baiting.
I asked a question, he responded by suggesting black criminal are more violent and posted a video of a black man beating up an old woman.
Ask, don’t tell. And try different words.
And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
Why are Blacks sentences for longer jail time for non violent drug offenses then Whites.
thinkingman: CanadianJudo: Call_me_Ishmael:And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
I don’t need to prove a negative that isn’t how debating works.
thats not proving a negative!
lol good grief
I don’t need to prove his generalization is not correct.
you havent proven yours is
And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
What i posted indicates that the “crime” has decrees of viciousness and depravity that are not part of the charge or conviction. The animal who punched the old lady was charged with assault. A man who punches his physical equal is charged with assault.
The two “assaults” are in no way equal in depravity and viciousness.
You’re getting close to the line. Make sure you don’t cross it.
Call_me_Ishmael:And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
Why are Blacks sentences for longer jail time for non violent drug offenses then Whites.
could be a few reasons, if true
Call_me_Ishmael:And you posted no proof that their crimes were not more vicious and depraved.
Why are Blacks sentences for longer jail time for non violent drug offenses then Whites.
They aren’t. Do you realize what would have to happen for that to be true?
What line is that?
What line is that?
The generalization by race line.