Pure Evil - How Far Are they Willing To Go?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@Dem

I’ve been trying to figure out what neo-Marxism is.

Oh just wait… he can’t wait to tell you.

Why don’t you do it?

[WuWei]

@tzu

I think the implication is that by not being bootstrapping self-isolators, non-conservative people who become doctors and lawyers and professors end up being fools for the elites who delude themselves into thinking the world can be more just, but really just make things worse for the good, happy, sovereign people.

No you don’t.

[WuWei]

@tzu

Really, it’s just their way of pretending their are evil traitors they have to expose.

Not traitors. Misguided fools. Immiserating people, especially children, is pretty evil.

[tzu]

Of course. And I can ready Gramsci in the original. You?

I prefer Leopardi, as the best obscure Italian who died young, but Gramsci’s superstructure is still evocative. I don’t really embrace the revolutionism, all the same.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@WuWei

Oh come now, we both know that’s not true. I’m not arguing.

No, we don’t.

I don’t know what your buzzwords mean, or how they fit into your overall narrative, which I also don’t understand, because you’ve consistently refused to explain it.

Every statement you make is along these lines - unspoken premises that you pretend I already know and that you refuse to elaborate on.

[tzu]

Yeah, you wrote that above. Silly, and a bit dull.

[Dem]

@WuWei

No. It is the continuous effort to “fix” Marxism’s failures.

To steal a quote from a video someone posted.

Where are the neo-Marxists? I wanted to do some light reading, just to get a basic understanding. 90% of what I get is Jordan Peterson. Where are the self described neo-Marxists? Or is this just a term, that some on the right label those on the left?

[WuWei]

@tzu

Of course. And I can ready Gramsci in the original. You?

I prefer Leopardi, as the best obscure Italian who died young, but Gramsci’s superstructure is still evocative. I don’t really embrace the revolutionism, all the same.

That letter wasn’t addressed to you.

Of course. Psuedo-intellectual horse dung, I expected nothing less.

Have a good night.

[tzu]

Any familiarity with the actual work of Gramsci must of necessity include his work on superstructure.

Heh.

Right on cue with the pseudo rubbish. Dig it out every time it’s made clear the pool is deeper than expected.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Exactly” what. Now you’re going to pretend you knew who Gramsci is?

Let’s try this again…

Yes I know Gramcsi is. I just don’t throw his name around and attribute his work with random unrelated ■■■■

[FlameHeart]

Honestly no one is innocent. Maybe I’m just biased because I’ve been identifying with one side for so long.

[FlameHeart]

@Dem

Good post. Just a question and thought.

What do you see in the DNC, that you belie

Vanguard Party is needed.

[Zander]

@Jezcoe

@TheDoctorIsIn

@WuWei

It’s not “evil-sounding”. It’s not even all wrong. Why do you deny it?

I have tried my best to make this clear - but I’m not denying anything because on this particular topic, I don’t know what you’re trying to say.

All of your arguments appear to have unspoken premises that you refuse to explain, and it makes your arguments gibberish.

It seriously is “whatever you believe is because of Marxists you never heard of and not because of your life experiences or understanding of history and what I believe is good and right and godly.”

What don’t you get?

After reading the thread, I think that’s a fair synopsis. Now we’re actually getting somewhere on this “topic.”

The intellectual anti-intellectualism, it burns.

[rp5x5]

Clearly, “they” can go very “far.” Pure insectoid, materialism masked by a false face.

[fallenturtle]

@FlameHeart

Anti-Fa seems to favor the Marxist flavor of Communism from what I can tell. Many An-Coms. Whereas the DNC believes more in the Leninist style of Communism- that is, they believe in the need of a “Vanguard Party”- that the state needs to restore equality between the workers and the Bourgeois.

The DNC doesn’t believe in any form of Communism and even those who are Democratic Socialists make up a very small portion of their membership. The DNC is basically social democrats… they support a mixed market based economy with regulations to protect workers, consumers, and the environment and a strong social safety net.

@FlameHeart

And that is the biggest red flag of Communism- needing the state, another “big person,” to restore compensation to the “little guy.” One of the reasons is because it is a one-party system. Trotsky went further, but I haven’t read up on him yet. Stalin was mentioned in history books in freshman year of high school

The anarcho-communists you mentioned earlier don’t want any state.

[fallenturtle]

@WuWei

@fallenturtle

Walmart.

Government

What metric are you using?

[fallenturtle]

@WuWei

@fallenturtle

How is a neo-marxist economy structured?

It’s not. Neo-marxism isn’t concerned with the economy, that will come later.

Then how you know there will be businesses buying other businesses?

[fallenturtle]

@WuWei

Queer theory is crit theory.

What you think it is is irrelevant. It still doesn’t mean all issues concerning queer people are derived from it.

[WuWei]

@tzu

Any familiarity with the actual work of Gramsci must of necessity include his work on superstructure.

Heh.

Right on cue with the pseudo rubbish. Dig it out every time it’s made clear the pool is deeper than expected.

No it mustn’t. Heh.

However, the superstructure is exactly what I have been discussing in relation. Heh.

I started off in the deep end. Heh.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Exactly” what. Now you’re going to pretend you knew who Gramsci is?

Let’s try this again…

Yes I know Gramcsi is. I just don’t throw his name around and attribute his work with random unrelated ■■■■

Neither do I.