There’s no question regarding him being prosecuted if he brought a gun to this! Hammer him!! That said, the rest is more of this same thing. It’s a different facet of this same instance. Did he ever pull it out? Did he ever threaten anyone with it? I’ve not seen evidence of that. It sounds like these are all different charges for the same thing. If you have a gun there…you transported it.
All I can say to this poor persecuted man who threatened to kill his own child is this:
“We love you, you’re very special. We’ve seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know you how feel.” Donald Trump
The state is the divine idea as it exists on earth. …this final end has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the state.
Courts and the federal and state governments recognize the spousal privilege in order to protect marital relationships from the harm that would befall them if spouses could be forced to testify against each other. However, this goal must be balanced against the competing need to avoid the harm caused when evidence is withheld from trials. Balancing these competing needs has resulted in various exceptions to, and underlying requirements for, the spousal privilege.
The relationship between the parents and their children, especially still living at home, should bear a similar equivalence in the eyes of the court IMO.