I saw goofy Stossel on Tucker the other evening and he left me scratching my head. Carlson had him on to rag on Youtube for censoring him…and he sorta impressed me as having smoked a couple of joints he champions before air time. Said he wasn’t being censored. Looked kinda blank-faced.
Wha?? He’s on Tucker bekez Youtube is censoring him but then he says he’s not being censored. WHAT IS THE POINT?? I axed of my really neat big scream television…
Stossel: I Don’t Want YouTube To Censor People, But ‘That Would Be Their Right’
On Monday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” journalist John Stossel discussed YouTube attaching text from the Wikipedia article on global warming underneath videos on the subject, including someof his. Stossel stated that the Wikipedia page is “one-sided.”
He also said YouTube isn’t censoring him and that he doesn’t want YouTube to censor people, but they can if they want to since they’re a private entity.
=========================
In matters of propaganda you have your outright propaganda… As in when a MSDNC reporter says, “According to sources Trump is a meanie.”
The first thing you should demand is…WHAT SOURCES?
You should ask that even if you happen to agree with the fake sources. And if the propagandist won’t tell you who their sources are then you should dismiss the story…whether it comes from the left, the right, or the planet Pluton.
But back to YouTube.
Possibly drugged out Stossel is ABSOLUTELY correct. They have EVERY right to practice their own version of propaganda by suppressing or outright denying video time to the right…bekez they are a PRIVATE ENTITY. Same as a privately owned bakery is a private biz and can serve or not serve whoever it likes. Right?
On the other hand…
You will admit and confess that the Federal gubment has EVERY right…and some would argue the absolute charge to BREAK UP SOCIAL MEDIA MONOPOLIES like YouTube, Microsoft, Google, Twitter and the other assorted mega huge one sided businesses.
Technically correct. But allowing the free flow of lies and half truth while suppressing or denying the delivery of the opposite viewpoint is in fact in support of propaganda. Sorta like when a local news rag editor says, “When we get a letter from a subscriber we agree with…run it! Otherwise kill it!”
