Yes it is.

If that’s what they do, then that’s unethical, so yes, they should be shut down. Don’t fertilize an egg and throw away the result. My point still stands.

No it’s not.

Yes it is.

Nope, it’s not.

Just checking. I appreciate the consistency.

1 Like

Actually it is…that one word is the difference between the definition of murder and the definition of homicide (actually murder is a subset of homicide).

Yup, it sure is.

Nope, sure isn’t.

Sure as heck is.

That’s all I have to say about this.

Flame- you’re wrong.

If you want to use a loaded word, use infanticide.

Will that satisfy you?

Sure the heck isn’t.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Yes it is.

I can do this all night long. You won’t be getting any emotional reaction out of me, or baiting me into a ban. But you however…

No it isn’t.

You can do it all night long but you’ll still be wrong.

I gave you a loaded word you can use.

You can use it, or you can continue to be wrong.

Words have definitions- they mean things.

Precisely correct.

Outside the womb, we support laws that protect children from being murdered already.

The OP has one conclusion: kill them in the womb so that infant mortality rate goes to zero. What else do the stats say? Nothing.

As we should, and I doubt you will find pretty much anyone regardless of political ideology who doesn’t have a defined mental medical issue who believes otherwise.