they did no such thing, they sidestepped the constitutional issue
Why did they do that? Hint, it’s constitutional.
If it was unconstitutional they would have said so.
Instead of letting trump have a second crack at shutting it down.
Allan
Actually, they are telling the news from their perspective.
An active thinker can easily work through what is fact and what is opinion, and then form their own conclusions.
1 Like
Will any news orgs at all endorse Trump? I guess OAN will, and maybe the NY Post, but I don’t think he even has Fox News in the bag any more.
Lol, now the Founders are the OG Deep State MSM.
There is zip, zero, nada resemblance of the MSM today vs the media during the era of our Founding Fathers. Check out Mark Levin’s best seller book
Unfreedom of the Press which was highlighted often on Sean Hannity’s TV show.
JayJay
31
Actually, no they didn’t.
The DACA opinion was extremely narrow and focused on how the Trump Administration went about trying to abolish it.
The ruling didn’t even address the question of whether DACA was constitutional or not.
Smyrna
32
…more like selling their perspective as news. 
JayJay
33
Stop listening to what other people tell you to believe and research it for yourself.
The press hasn’t changed all that much throughout history…media outlets are always controlled by someone, and none are ever completely objective…they all package the news according to some slant or agenda, whether consciously or subconsciously.
Because all humans filter the truth through their preconceptions.
The Founders themselves controlled much of the press during the Revolutionary Era…so of course they sold a slanted view of the news of the day…their slant.
He said news orgs, not conspiracy theory websites.
2 Likes
So, no news outlet that says what you want to hear says what you don’t want to hear.
And any news outlet that says what you don’t want to hear is not news, like blacks who say what Biden doesn’t like are not black.
Do you really think that form of logic will get you to truth?
1 Like
Well duh. They didn’t even have electricity back then, much less television, the internet, satellites, or many of the other luxuries we have today. Now you can literally get information at the touch of a finger. Meaning they can deliver information to us much much faster.
1 Like
Whatever dude. Glenn Beck and Alex Jones aren’t anything close to the truth. Never have been. It’s telling that you think they provide news though. Really.
And it’s telling that you believe they don’t.
Yeah, I’m weird like that. 
sikofit
40
No. No “news outlets” that regularly peddle conspiracy theories. Its that simple
1 Like