I do because Trump has been found liable for fraud already… twice. Isn’t that enough to know he has a propensity for fraud?
I have read your attempts to rationalize the actions of the companies in this case. They are silly.
Zippy
516
Keep going with the ruse
Actually there are spot on in adherence to GAAP.
But then you already know that.
Quick question. Did you also pretend to believe Hillary’s Russia scheme/hoax? Impeachment?
Zippy
517
Let me share a little joke.
A man asked several people what 2+2 equals….
He asked a mathematician and he said 4
He asked an economist and he said 4
He asked a statistical analyst and he said 4
He asked an Accountant and the accountant asked, what do you want it to equal.
What ruse?
The only ruse I see if Trump and his propensity for fraud. Do you think his Trump University and Foundation fraud was legitimate?
Can’t answer the question? It’s becoming a pattern
How in the world could you possibly know that without seeing their corporate tax filings?
Here’s some free advice. When you toss in questions entirely disconnected form the topic, it reads a bit desperate. As for a response, yes I believe. It’s hard to simply ignore an investigation documenting a variety of misdeeds and potential illegalities over 500+ pages resulting in dozens of indictments and nearly a dozen guilty charges. Im unclear which impeachment you’re referring to, but Trump was impeached twice by the House, only to be acquitted by the Senate. Those are just indisputable facts, but they have no real relevancy to the topic.
1 Like
No they are not.
Not in the amounts claimed
No my only belief with regards to Russia and 2016 election was always that they meddled. There is no proof that they changed one vote. I think that people did stay home but Hilary was the primarily reason. The social media noise just helped them along
I said from day one that collusion was nonsense.
The two impeachments were pure politics. The first one should have never happened. He should have been at most censured. The second one is problematic but for different reasons. They were impeaching someone who was no longer in office. But He incited the riot. Not on that day but he incited them.
Zippy
523
According to……?
Btw. Props for admitting all the other garbage was nothing but political hit job.
Now if you could only admit that the curre legal rangling is also political. Nothing more, nothing less
According to the vast difference in numbers used in each case
It is political. It doesn’t change the fact that he did it
Zippy
525
Doesn’t matter.
You buy a building for 100
Later you refi for 1000.
Still only pay property taxes on the 100
This is really basic stuff.
You are purposefully oversimplifying what they did. That’s why you try to call it basic. This isn’t just buying refinancing and then only paying taxes on original value.
Zippy
527
No. I am not trying to call it basic, I am calling it basic. Because it is.
You need to immediately get in touch with the President’s attorneys and tell them how easy it is.
1 Like
There is not any question about whether or not Trump committed fraud.
He has been found guilty of fraud.
There are dozens and dozens of examples. In one, he listed his Trump Tower apartment as 30,000 square feet, when in fact it is 10,000 square feet, tripling the value of the asset.
That is fraud. He signed an attestation that the information he provided was true. It was not true. that is fraud.
A witness yesterday explained that he estimated Trump saved himself ~$169 million dollars in higher interest expense through his fraud.
He is guilty of fraud. Not a question. Not an accounting discrepancy. GAAP has nothing to do with it. Nothing.
If you want to debate whether or not the case brought against Trump was political - ok I understand that. that is a legitimate argument.
Maybe everyone does it. Maybe he is being singled out and that is unfair. FAFO.
But he committed fraud so can we dispense with the BS.
3 Likes
Zippy
531
LOL.
As usual now the shift of focus from the post to the poster.
Typical and expected
