Ponder…if the “bipartisan border bill” had passed, Trump would now be required to allow in 4,999 migrants a day and he could not legally stop any without the approval of the left wing DC judges.
It honestly should have been called the bipartisan Open Border bill, as it would have functioned more so in that capacity. A complete joke of legislation!
Critprogs over the past four years have argued on TV, radio, and here that our sovereignty essentially ends at the utterance of a few rehearsed magic words from anyone and everyone who shows up at the border. They believe that’s there’s absolutely NOTHING that any president can do about that.
There may not have been anything in writing, but there were assurances made.
Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner
Slavic Studies Panel Addresses “Who Promised What to Whom on NATO Expansion?”
you keep adding “money” to weapons. I said, and Trump said, nothing about money.
Flooding Ukraine with weapons is the stick to get Russia to negotiate. Without it, Putin has no reason to negotiate; Trump knows this. I hope the threat is enough.
Trump has also said he would sell weapons to Ukraine and loan them the money to buy them, which they can pay back later (if ever). I support this too. The money “loaned” would never leave the country. it will simply go out on one budget line and come back on another. that money Ukraine “pays” us could then be used to fix some bridges and stuff. Then later, when Ukraine pays us back, it can be used to alleviate the debt incurred.