Pompeo wont let state department officals testify

You’ll never see it. As a lib, you have your filters. You won’t ever see how stuff in the version 1.0 witch hunt was twisted in the media and my the entirety of libdom. You won’t see how stuff from the Kavanaugh “hearings” (which were another witch hunt) were contorted.

All libs say they are not. ( shrug )

Snort. Never gonna change. Which is why I see no value in wasting my time trying.

It is completely relevant to your point. © did the same thing to Obama.

It will be months before a vote on articles for impeachment if any are produced.

So much for a hasty reckless…errr speedy process.

:put_litter_in_its_place:

It appears Volker is appearing as scheduled. What he says may well begin the process of determining Rudy Giuliani’s fate; not too mention Trump as well.

Thorough takes time… there is no right to a speedy investigation

I am not in favor of hasty. That is what Pelosi sold the Mueller weary masses.

:put_litter_in_its_place:.

The Democratic base is more interested in thorough than fast.

That was before the flood of migration from the south of the borders, those escaping the hell of a socialist country only to come into America and vote for the same policies they had to flee from. Look at California hell even New York city and Miami is red.

1 Like

Sure if you ignore her words…

No she didnt…

Don’t argue, what do we know about what we were sold and believe.

1 Like

Oh sorry…

1 Like

Micheal Goodwin thinks she rushed.

What a difference a day could have made! Imagine if Nancy Pelosi had held her impeachment fire for 24 hours.

Then she would have had the transcript of President Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine. Even a quick read would have told her it was not as advertised.

She would have learned there was no threat from Trump and no talk of a quid pro quo involving foreign aid in exchange for an investigation of Joe Biden. By the time she finished the five pages, Pelosi would have realized that the media’s promise of a smoking gun was a false promise.

With the facts in front of her, the House speaker would have wisely put off Tuesday’s doomsday impeachment push and waited for a more compelling issue to justify an historic effort to overturn the 2016 presidential election.

1 Like

When Comey refused to answer questions because he said that the answers related to an ongoing investigation, where was the outrage that Congressional oversight was being destroyed?
There are rules to these things. Like giving people time to prepare and seek legal counsel.

(BTW, Comey apparently only meant you couldn’t talk about ongoing investigations to Congress, not to the NYTs)

2 Likes

Personally, color me surprised!

I would not expect such a move from the most transparent administration in history! :laughing:

Oh stop. Who pays attention to silly things like that when you’ve got Trump in your sights?

1 Like

Cool …person has an opinion…that’s not newsworthy

1 Like

That wasn’t a transcript.

Don’t need to read any further.

1 Like

Looks like the State IG requested a briefing with congress to share Ukraine documents.

1 Like