Samm
1135
Witnesses are commonly wrong … sometimes they deliberately lie.
Samm
1136
Knowing that is a possibility, why would you resist?
Samm
1138
It seems like this message always gets lost in these discussions.
1 Like
Samm
1139
Its called facetious sarcasm, not a personal attack.
Samm
1140
Not necessarily, but you as the arrestee have to take it into consideration.
[quote=“SixFoot, post:1137, topic:234349”]
True. But I don’t expect them to wander out to the burbs of a second amendment red state any time soon. They are stupid but not idiots. Or maybe they’re idiots but not imbeciles?
1 Like
SixFoot
1142
They don’t have enough gas to get here, that’s for sure. lol
1 Like
My favorite scene in all the Indiana Jones movies.
I was sitting in a theatre the 1st time i watched this scene and the audience all burst out laughing.

did the cops know he had no weapon?
did he defy their orders?
to become a millionaire, evidently
thanks to the braindead
mot1man
1146
So innocent police officers aren’t tax payers?
you know what would fix this problem…?
getting rid of all cops
give that money to midnight basketball, and un wed moms
oh and the schools.
tnt
1148
the cops could have just taken the keys out of the ignition.
Instead they shot him.
And does having a warrant mean you should be shot?
Olmehk
1149
Non compliance does not warrant execution. There is no justification for shooting a non-violent, unarmed SUSPECT in the back. Was he involved in ACTUAL criminal activity? Or was he breaking up a fight?
Shooting an unarmed non-violent suspect is NEVER justified. Any American trying to justify that behavior should familiarize themselves with the Bill Of Rights

Olmehk:
Non compliance does not warrant execution. There is no justification for shooting a non-violent, unarmed SUSPECT in the back. Was he involved in ACTUAL criminal activity? Or was he breaking up a fight?
Shooting an unarmed non-violent suspect is NEVER justified. Any American trying to justify that behavior should familiarize themselves with the Bill Of Rights
Specifically, which Amendment?
rp5x5
1151

Olmehk:
Non compliance does not warrant execution. There is no justification for shooting a non-violent, unarmed SUSPECT in the back. Was he involved in ACTUAL criminal activity? Or was he breaking up a fight?
Shooting an unarmed non-violent suspect is NEVER justified. Any American trying to justify that behavior should familiarize themselves with the Bill Of Rights
Does a knife count as a violent threat? Does reaching into a car to get something,against their instruction, constitute a threat? Does getting tazed and still walk away, constitute a threat?
Olmehk
1153
The 4th and 5th Amendments.
rp5x5
1154
There is no amendment allowing criminals or suspects to ignore police orders,