Smyrna
21
Appointed by Barack Obama
I’m shocked I tell you… 
Now let an appellate court over rule her decision and expose her radical political agenda.
Changing the law would be racist. How many Dems would get behind changing that law? None.
DougBH
23
Nobody is going to have to rewrite anything. Most likely a decision based on forum shopping that won’t hold.
But a good example of what we could wind up with if Democrats gained enough senate seats to pack the Supreme Court.
Law doesn’t have to mention race in order to be racist or have racist outcomes.
1 Like
dred scott wasn’t dumb, it was evil. there’s a difference.
and those who see race in everything likely have some racial issues.
Not sure what this statement has to do with my last post… but ok.
no problem here, i’m beginning to like impeachments.
1 Like
WuWei
30
Pretty much everything. The statement in your previous post like most CT, takes a semblance of the truth and turns it on its head.
It also requires the ignoring of every single other factor.
Show a law that doesn’t mention race that is racist.
No outcomes.