22 billion for anything but a wall! This in spite of the fact that where walls have been introduced ; there have been 90 % plus reductions in illegal crossings.Apparently, NP and co. believe that high tech will act as a similar deterrent by focusing on legal points of entry. The implicit logic is that most illegal immigrants only do it because the legal ports of entry are so inefficient. Anyone who considers this logic , and the fact that, in Dem eyes , there are 22 Billions to spend , just not on walls which have proved to be very effective, should conclude that the Dems have little interest in carrying out a project which will maximize security for the USA if, by building a wall , Donald Trump will look good in the eyes of the electorate. The same Dem attitude probably applies in other proposals which will be efficient and benefit the USA ire Not if it makes Trump and the GOP look good- better to screw the USA public.