Might makes… legal?

Yes I have read this also, what would you see in terms of dividing it obviously wouldn’t be a north/south divide. I am thinking more like 6-7 regions like this as a model.

nnn

I would like to see everyone have a chance to move to the region they would like, with visa free travel between regions. The one thing we do share is language but even that has been under attack throughout the years. Plus it would need to be designed to were family could easily visit each other. Travel would be handled something like the Schengen agreement.

With a shared language it would likely have a greater survival chance than the E.U. currently does.

That map won’t work.

This one needs adjusting too, but it’s closer.

4 Likes

That map is garbage too. Need to carve out the center of CA and include them with the top of Nevada, Montana, Idaho and the top of AZ.

Thanks for clearing that up I think it was something in the line or Texas could like California split into different states within Texas,… :slight_smile:

He’s the “law and order” president.

nope. 17th

1 Like

I agree, this looks more in line with todays political environment.

1 Like

Yeah but fat chance of that happening. We can’t even get one together to amend the Constitution. What makes you think we’re going to have one to abolish the Central government?

Imposition of union by the use of overwhelming force and atrocities against civilians that is what constitutes “legal?”

You have absolutely lost the ability to apply your ever luvin cognitive thought processes.

We’ve already had one civil war in which the people trying to leave the union were branded traitors pretty much unanimously by the left.

Now the left seems to want a split? Go figure.

Guess it’s some how different when it is them?

A split isn’t happening anyway. Just commenting on the sudden switcheroo in thinking by some.

1 Like

With people like Donald Trump making the divisions in this country ever deeper, this scenario may just come to pass. Especially if he is re-elected.

Not immediately, but probably sooner than one might expect. It would be catastrophic.

Here’s a very interesting video of a journalist filming the protests in NYC. What she says she witnessed is very telling. The first point is that everything was truly a peaceful protest and that BLM members were demanding peace…from everyone. One of the BLM members stated to not go any further down a street because looters were waiting for their arrival and when they got to this point, they would begin destroying property and loot the businesses. At one point a BLM member attacks one of the looters coming out of a store with armfuls of stolen goods, saying…“you’ll not hijack our protest”. It’s incredible. It’s then suggested that the NYPD didn’t stop the looters but instead, went after the peaceful protestors because they were easier to catch and didn’t resist? What…the hell…is going on here folks?

This is by and large, the police culture we have in this country.

That isn’t even half of the real problem. The real problem is why they’re necessary in the first place?

Which ones? All of them.
They don’t need serious numbers. They carry out (or try to carry out) terrorist attacks all of the time. There are very few Jews or POC in flyover country, so they’ll probably be less dangerous there.

Look closer and read my post.

Donald Trump is a result, not a cause.

We don’t live in a police state!