You mean like the Voting Rights Acts? They passed.
I passed easilyā¦nope it was a massive undertaking.
It would take a similar undertaking to get what you want.
Wonāt happen.
Allan
You claimed such legislation could not pass congress yet it has, several times in the past.
You didnāt even realize the fedās have legitimate oversight of state elections and in establishing the conditions under which they are conducted.
Might be time to beat a hasty retreat under the cover of smoke.
I said it was a massive undertaking not that it have passed,congress before.
Allan
No, that isnāt what you said.
Itās been done and it can be done again.
Itās not like there is video of a republican politician disagreeing with you.
So what? Does he speak for all republicans? All conservatives?
1 Like
Neither do you. The point is that republican politicians are on the record stating that their goal is to restrict voting ability
Just Because some of you guys hide behind āoh itās sacred therefore you better vote in person and not be lazy about itā the truth is that the fewer people vote the better it is for the gop.
Yet I didnāt claim to.
Iām for restricting voting ability to, to limit it to only those why are lawfully registered and legally eligible and thatās what most of us on this side of the fence are calling for.
āWe, usāā¦ seems like a claim
No most of you are not. You have no way to support that comment.
Tom_Ch
259
As long as ids are easy to get and free, I support it. We canāt have people waiting for hours get ID and costing money. That will hurt poor people.
Not by any stretch of any known definition but you keep trying.
Poor people have to have IDās too and we all pay for them.
1 Like
Known definition of what.
JayJay
263
Then since voting is a right, you should be all for making it easier to vote as you enthusiastic for making it easier to own a firearm.
Right?
Otherwiseā¦you pick and choose which rights you want to make easy and which you want to make difficult just like everyone else.
GOP leaders are on record as wanting lower turnouts because higher turnouts donāt favor themā¦their base is smaller.
They disguise this by using a Narrative that tickles your earsā¦they spin stories of increasing fraud to scare you into accepting regulations that make it harder to vote.
Even Trump- the people he brought out of the woodwork to vote for him vote only FOR himā¦they donāt come out for elections where he isnāt running, even if he tells them to.
Those who vote because they care about governance do not include these peopleā¦and of those peopleā¦the GOPās share is small and shrinking.
Wrong.
Because Iām actually fine with requiring an ID to buy a firearm, and to vote.
Consistency.
2 Likes
Seriously, can you not follow such a simple conversation?
So what? Does he speak for all republicans? All conservatives?
Neither do you.
āWe, usāā¦ seems like a claim
Nowhere have I claimed to speak for all conservatives or republicans and you know it so why even try this?
Well yes, when you eliminate to the greatest extent people voting illegally odds are turnout will be lower and the outcome will favor republicans.
Didnāt say it couldnāt be done, said it would be a massive undertaking in the 2021 congressā¦
Condseiring that you want to surpress voter turnout. Wonāt happen.
Allan
I was just making sure that you werenāt referencing some other part of my post I said seems on purposeā¦ i mean you are the one using encompassing terms like most we us. So it certainly seemsā¦ by every definition.
And as to trying, i will never stop trying to explain common sense. Itās just the way it is.
