Again, I thought you flounced out already.
ok thats enough now please
WuWei
205
āYouāre killing him!ā āHeās not moving!ā
They were right.
But what is the point?
Some of your āfactsā are not relevant to the case⦠like his prior bad acts.
a good judge and jury wont be prejudiced based on racism narratives and media hype
if we talk about his facial expressions and tone then we have to talk about them when he was initially being courteous and professional to floyd. which will be ignored in this trial surely
dont worry heāll be guilty of murder. whether or not this is justice will always be debatable. but these trials are not really about justice. they are about confirmation of bias
those people arent doctors and not aware of the OD levels of drugs in his system
should all cops listen to people with iphobes now?
the point is all facts should be presented.
whether they feed your racism narrative or not
WuWei
210
One of them is an EMT who Chauvin would not allow to exam him.
OD levels of drugs in his system require medical intervention, which Chauvin denied Floyd. Not kneeling on a neck.
i agree
were the people pleading with iphones knowledgeable in medical intervention or that he was full of drugs?
WuWei
212
Yes. When people with Iphones tell cops they are killing someone and heās not moving, cops should listen.
i strongly disagree
nitwits on the sidelines shriek all kind of stupid ā ā ā ā during these things
His prior bad acts are not relevant to the case, are they?
WuWei
216
At least one of them was knowledgeable in medical intervention.
Were they correct?
No.
But Iām open to your thoughts⦠do you think his prior bad acts should be relevant to his murder. If so, why?
doesnt matter
cop cant hesitate in their jobs on bystanders wailing and gnashing
the jobās too dangerous
what i think is irrelevant
what does the law say?
WuWei
222
No it isnāt. What was the danger for 9 minutes and 28 seconds?
The man was handcuffed and on the ground.
The EMT was there. Not a bystander, she was dispatched.