You’ll want to strike that one.
Stanford
UCLA
John’s Hopkins
3 of the top hospital systems in the country… all non profit
I’m already there.
Are you kidding?
It reduced lawsuits…medical costs did not go down, nor did health insurance.
Strike that one. DEI got to it.
Running in the black.
1 Like
What’s your evidence medical costs haven’t gone down?
Well, let’s see. A woman with breast cancer or other gyn cancer or any cancer requiring chemo gets pregnant…
A woman who has heart disease or arthritis requiring medication that is toxic for a fetus gets pregnant…
Im sure there are others.
1 Like
They all are still… as of 2024… the top medical centers… period.
You have no evidence to say otherwise. And yes I hope they run in the black… do you know what a non profit is?
Look, the healthcare system in this country is failing. In my opinion, insurance is the reason. We’re already paying in to medicare and all that.
Why do I need to spend my prime earning years making some insurance company rich?
1 Like
UCLA isn’t.
Absolutely. It’s like the Catholic church.
It’s is.
You have zero evidence to the contrary
none of them are cases where it must happen “today”. Further, in the event it is immediately life threatening, there is nowhere in this nation where abortion is denied to save the life of the mother.
1 Like
I posted it yesterday or the day before. Your alma mater has turned into a 3rd rate school. Congratulations.
Insurance coverage.
if its medically neccessary? Get better insurance. Otherwise, abortions are not expensive, pay for it.
Its a simple thing. you get the care you need and insurance pays for the share you agreed they would pay for the things you agreed they would cover and you pay the rest. It works the same way whether an insurance company does it, TX does it, or the fed does it. The difference being, the fed has no business doing it. Not a federal issue
Which makes it interstate commerce. Which implies federal.
I get the insurance my employer provides.
That doesn’t show anything. Texas limited medical liability. It didn’t limit other liability (such as loss of wages and other economic factors.)
The fact that lawsuits can still happen – at the same frequency, even if medical liability is limited – means that all the same protections and procedures and overhead must still remain in place.
OK, “need” doesn’t RIGHTFULLY and Constitutionally make it a fedgov issue.
Be careful what Pandora’s Box you are looking to open here.
