Oh, So Now the "whistleblower" Had "First-Hand" Knowledge?

The people of the United States of America!


Why don’t you go look it up yourself, don’t be lazy, besides if you look it up yourself perhaps it will stick with you so you don’t keep misusing the word.


“I was not a direct witness.”

Which is it??

Why the two stories??


I just want to make sure we all know who was defending this traitor, his confederates and adam schiff.



There was no treason committed by the WB.

Your premise is false and rather idiotic.

Some things in the complaint they were a direct witness to, some things they weren’t. Why is that so hard to understand?

Not a direct witness of the call. But they had first-hand knowledge to other things in the complaint.

I don’t understand why this is so hard to get.

You guys are loosing it…in real time…relax .


Well that is more than one thing for them to take in at one time. Dammit that is just too freaking much!

Oh shut up you traitor enabler!!!


1 Like