Yes everyone knows. That’s some revelation. He all but admit it on British marginal television lol
They made a movie about it. It made millions of dollars
Nothing new at all. Definitely makes the hype he did a week ago look silly.
I like investigative journalism (and it plays a critical role) but today any tom, dick or harry with a camera thinks they can do it and most times all they are doing is running with tick tock or Youtube conspiracies.
1 Like
But andy ngo!!!
So a higher up in the UK dynasty was stated to have raped minors and what happened to him? Was he prosecuted? If what was stated is crucial, honest, accurate and compelling…why was he not prosecuted? This tape is of someone within the UK inner circle stating that they can testify to these crimes? If that’s true, will it make a difference? Should it? I’m not one for shrugging off the horrendous crimes committed by anyone, especially those of such magnitude and if this will begin a just prosecution, I’m all for it. How about you two?
Why don’t you ask UK? Did you ask UK yet? How about now?
You are the one who opened their mouth.
No I opned my mouth about O’Keefe selling you a breaking story that caused him to fear for his lfie. He Lied to you again. Like he always does.
Everyone knew this. He went on UK television (BBC I believe) and talked about it indirectly. a movie was made on thes subject. It grossed millions of dolalrs.
I opened my mouth as to that
You of course as you always do instead of admitting wrongness - swithced subjects because if you do ever admit you were wrong you’d catch fire and I don’t mean figuratively…
1 Like
Yep the fact Prince Andrew faces no charges is wrong but then again no one else has been charged.
This new drop by O’Keefe says nothing new and he did over hype it.
Its the same old Epstein stuff that is regurgitated continuously.
Now apply the J6 judicial process to this and is there a two-tier system?
Evidently there are many, many videos showing Epstein with children. In those videos, how many others are there? Who are they? If the FBI has videos plainly showing these crimes, why hasn’t anyone been prosecuted besides Epstein and his lady friend? How high up the chain does this go? Will the Trump Administration deal with this fairly, applying justice equally to all?
Well thats a topic for the J6 thread, we are talking about O’Keefes ridiculous hyping of a video that really all it does is regurgitate what is already known.
Come on Smyrna even you have to admit this is not O’Keefes finest work especially considering how he hyped it up with the “i am going dark, i am not suicidal, pray for me” video.
1 Like
No one disagrees on prosecuting anyone involved in Epsteins child sec trafficking ring but Bondi is not covering herself in glory in all of this. She just keeps teasing what there may be.
I do not think anyone will ever face charges which is wrong and sad.
1 Like
There ya go. Make it about anything else other than okeefe lying to you
And it was a prosecutor who Trump then hired for a position in his admin that took it easy on Epstein in the first place. But he won’t talk about any of that
I was going to mention her connection to the Epstein case and yes she did go easy on Epstein.
1 Like
It’s actually another example of the weaponization of our government that’s the “drip, drip, drip” thread. If the FBI has thousands of videos and has for years now, what does this plainly say? I wasn’t aware that they had all of this evidence but O’Keefe is bringing it to light. The initial video released Wednesday was below the hype. Now he’s exposing even more and how big of an exposure this is, solely depends on those in our judicial system that decide if they are going to prosecute those doing criminal activity? The more they do, the larger this is. The more popular the criminals, the larger this is. Now…I’ll wait, as usual…drip, drip, drip…
…and I wholeheartedly agree.
Why don’t you leave your emotions at the door? 
Hahaha. You think claims of “two tier system and Jan 6” in a discussion about okeefe lying to you isn’t emotional? That’s adorable
