They are suggesting the President* be shielded from oversight at all costs
By the way - I think you should read the article in the OP a little closer.
I dont know where you’re getting the idea that Schiff is going to lead anything. He wants to set up an independent commission.
That’s a lie. Nothing about him is even remotely independent. Please tell me you don’t believe this.
I couldn’t possibly give less of a ■■■■ about what you care about.
I am saying that you appear to be projecting quite a lot of intent and emotion onto people you’ve only ever seen on television.
Since that’s the only support you’ve given to your argument, it follows that your claims are based not on logic, but your own emotions towards Schiff.
He wants to set up an independent commission and not be a part of it? I don’t believe that for a second.
1 Like
That’s what he said.
You are welcome to believe your imagination more, if that makes you feel better.
1 Like
They have active imaginations due to SDS
Your replies say otherwise. You sound quite ready to abandon topical discussion in favor of personal shots. You do have a history. Just sayin.
Don’t give them any ideas. They were already talking about “marshall” law at one point. 
I have not made any personal shots towards you. I am only interested in the validity (or lack thereof) of the claims you make in your posts.
You appear to be trying to deflect from that, by making false accusations regarding my intent.
I don’t recall you guys complaining about the Benghazi hearings (I,II,III,IV…).
I seem to recall nothing but complaints from the left about hearings…
WuWei
138
Is this an intelligence issue?
1 Like
How many Benghazi hearings were needed?
And I seem to remember nothing but support from the right.
Now the tables have turned, and you’re really not in a position to cry foul.
So you’re no different from the right. Good to know.
