Oh cool... Once again, Dems "find" ballots. This time, in NJ

[zantax]

I identify as a naked mole rat, I demand my own restroom. Well, other self identified naked mole rats can use it as well I guess.

[Guvnah]

@Guvnah

At a college hockey game:

Hah, I posted that in the wring thread.

Hope others enjoy it.

[Konssurvative1]

Rufus is that you?

[biggestal99]

@gooddad409

Dems never miss a trick

Lots of laughs, Essex is a huge dem stronghold.

Some,election worker screws up, the cons start yelling fraud.

By chance, where part of Pavlovian experiment.

Allan

[WorldWatcher]

@WorldWatcher

Just curious before jumping to conclusions.

Has anyone even questioned what the DEM is talking about? Or is it just proceed to post based on tribe?

• Is there confirmation of any “found” ballots?
• Is there confirmation that there are 12,000 “found” ballots?
• In what county were these ballots “found”?
• What were the circumstances of the discovery of these “found” ballots?

Without these answers to these basic questions then the politician may simply be taking a page from the playbook of he who should not be named.
.
.
.
.
I’ll place one possibility on the table, and I’ll admit I’m just shooting in the dark. Under New Jersey law mail-in ballots have to be received on or before Monday (November 8) according to the New Jersey vote by mail web page. If these 12,000 “found” votes are based on mail-in ballots that were requested but haven’t been received, then referring to them as “found” ballots is complete ■■■■■■■■■

WW

Any particulars yet beyond a politicians claims?

WW

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Munimula1

And why do you think Sweeney’s shenanigans are ignored by me?

And I am commenting not only on that idiot liar Sweeney, but on the hypocrisy of the right.

Yet you see no hypocrisy on the left… thanks.