Taken back, to clarify.

Interesting. Not the answer I was expecting, but I love it. So, self interest is now moral? Are you channeling Ayn?

From where?

None.

Tyrants of course. That is the majority of human history. If you want rights, you’ve got to take them.

1 Like

Ok, I’m good with that. Where did they come from for the tyrants to take them?

I just knew you were going to bring that passage up… Put the whole scenario of that scene in context…
Who were they? What was there goal? How many?.. So many factors here that rule it out as socialism as people view socialism today…But again, you know these things already.

Yes! Absolutely!!

Who possesses them first that they may be taken from?

Didn’t see you already asked this question until I posted…

Why would anyone need to put anything in context?

That is not how religion works.

There is such a thing as Cristian based Socialism and it is an equally valid religious view of economic theory as Christian based Capitalism.

Nowhere.

No one.

Then I take it you’re in the NO REPARATIONS column…

Good, one lib down, 100 million to go… :smiley:

1 Like

Nope I’m in the FOR REPARATIONS column.

No if we had a right to life we would not grow old and die. You should not kill does 2 things 1 it shows it is not your right to kill others as that is God’s domain. It teaches you to respect life as a gift.

There are no rights just choices to be made.

No you again are displaying ignorance. Free will does not mean freedom from consequences.

I would say more valid.

It doesn’t say kill, it says murder.

Even soldiers were considered unclean after war so as to show respect for life.