Has Donald been the departure from elitist entitlement and corruption his supporters had hoped for?
Or just a more palatable sort of elitist corruption than previous incarnations?
Has Donald been the departure from elitist entitlement and corruption his supporters had hoped for?
Or just a more palatable sort of elitist corruption than previous incarnations?
Anything on topic?
Anything other than âWhere were the cries about obstruction from libs before we all started supporting Donald?â
No, anything on the topic of this thread. You seem confused.
No, anything on the topic of this thread. You seem confused.
Itâs why I have you, friend. Your wisdom keeps me grounded.
Iâm fine with waiting until after Trump is voted out in 2020 to let the courts decide if he obstructed and committed other crimes.
Iâm fine with waiting until after Trump is voted out in 2020 to let the courts decide if he obstructed and committed other crimes.
Likewise. Letâs ride this â â â â storm out and worry about indictments after heâs left office.
Google is cool
âObstruction of justice is defined by federal statute as any âinterference with the orderly administration of law and justiceâ and governed by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1521. Federal code identifies more than 20 specific types of obstruction, including âObstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committeesâ (18 U.S.C. § 1505), the specific code section cited in the Nixon and Clinton articles of impeachment.
Other ways an individual may commit this offense include, but are not limited to, the following acts:
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/obstruction-of-justice.html
So would getting a former campaign staffer to contact the Attorney General to request that the current investigation into foreign interference be limited to future interference and not the interference in the past election count?
So would getting a former campaign staffer to contact the Attorney General to request that the current investigation into foreign interference be limited to future interference and not the interference in the past election count?
Hey, stay on topic! This is about bleachbit bingo!
party-free:So Trump shouldnât be held accountable for his attempts at derailing an investigation into him becauseâŚsomething something country divided something something?
I mean, what would you call âdictated a statement that tried to cover for his sonâs meeting with Russians in Trump towerâ exactly? Little white lie? Nothingberder? Because thatâs a pretty â â â â â â â big lie weâve got on our hands right now that amounts to a LITTLE more than âorange man bad.â But trying the NPC nonsense seems pretty NPC in and of itself.
Do you see mention of President Trump in the OP?
ummm yes?
So the question is: What does a President, any President,
Mueller cant bring any charges against the sitting prez therefore by persnickety trump via vee must be innocent
Fulmination:Iâm fine with waiting until after Trump is voted out in 2020 to let the courts decide if he obstructed and committed other crimes.
Likewise. Letâs ride this â â â â storm out and worry about indictments after heâs left office.
I pray its ugly. As so many Cons have pointed out trump has been in litigation his whole life so it would be a shame to deprive him in his last remaining years of something he has become so accustomed too.
I.e. Richard Nixon.
Not what he asked is it?
Or trying to keep someone from testifying against you.
âŚas in giving anyone who couldâŚimmunity?
So would getting a former campaign staffer to contact the Attorney General to request that the current investigation into foreign interference be limited to future interference and not the interference in the past election count?
Are you kidding me? All they talked about were âgrand children and golf scoresââŚamirite?
Jezcoe:So would getting a former campaign staffer to contact the Attorney General to request that the current investigation into foreign interference be limited to future interference and not the interference in the past election count?
Are you kidding me? All they talked about were âgrand children and golf scoresââŚamirite?
A sitting President did that?
Wouldnât that be a conspiracy to commit or being an accomplice?
Thatâs witness tampering â a seperate crime.