I’m interested in your perspective, not “theirs.” Seen anything resembling obstruction of justice from the man currently tweeting from the Oval Office?
Credit where it’s due, conan…you were the first to openly declare your support for Donald was based in wanting revenge on people you wanted to see suffer. Some of these Johnny-come-latelys played coy for the first year and a half.
Not at all. Your original question was “what does it take for something to be obstruction of justice?” Your commentary is obviously slanted to reflect all the actions you feel Clinton (and perhaps Obama) engaged in that qualified her for that status. I was merely curious whether you felt the question could be equally turned onto Donald.
You brought up the games, I merely replied in kind.