It seems you don’t understand what obstruction of congress is. It isn’t vetoing a bill.
1 Like
Smyrna
23
If…you’re going to lock somebody up, there should be a crime, an investigation of that crime and a fair prosecution for that crime…agreed? Now I know that libs don’t like proper investigations that actually reveal a crime…as just obviously displayed but…keep your eyes on IG Durham. I think he’ll deliver on what you’re asking for?
He picked gorsuch 5 mins in, managed to start an investigation into voter fraud 10 mins in. But yeah he is totally inexperienced and has no advisers until now that is!
LULZ, Obstruction of Congress is NOT in the President’s job description. You people are ALL admitting that you have no idea how our government works…
1 Like
When Durham doesn’t pan out, i beg you to fix your faucet. If not for the environment then just for your own sanity. That dripping and no evidence makes homer something something.
2 Likes
STODR
27
Having different policies then the Congress and not willing to be put up with their petty bitches and investigations is also not obstruction of congress.
I guess that would depend on whether one thinks this is petty, but that is up to the Congress since it is up to them. Here’s a partial list, both parties are on there:
Looks to be a crime after all.
Obstruction of Congress (18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512)
He’ll get them next year! Or this November, depending on who you ask. 
I heard Dershowitz float this malarkey on Fox the other night.
Smyrna
32
Remember this…you’ve got a deal.
sikofit
33
You just proved your own statement untrue. Voting for impeachment as outlined in the Constitution is in no way an abuse of power

Smyrna:

hindsight:
And yet, now that he suddenly has all this experience… no one is locked up! LOL!
Poor little Trump has no experience with politics… after all, he never ran a political campaign before (he has) and never switched political parties before (he did) or contributed money to politicians ( he has). He is like a sweet, innocent child.
But whatever you need to tell yourself to make you happy, I guess.
If…you’re going to lock somebody up, there should be a crime, an investigation of that crime and a fair prosecution for that crime…agreed? Now I know that libs don’t like proper investigations that actually reveal a crime…as just obviously displayed but…keep your eyes on IG Durham. I think he’ll deliver on what you’re asking for?
Well, what’s the President waiting for. LOL
Please explain this for those of us who aren’t Always-Trumpers.
Obstruction of Congress is not among the enumerated powers of the Executive Branch in the Constitution… for all of you who insist on government strictly following the Constitution.
DougBH
36
It is on top. IMO it became that way in part because Congress and the Executive are often at each others throat and they both decide it is better to let the Court decide than to battle it out based on the loyalty of the army.
DougBH
37
Is obstruction of Congress listed in the Constitution, then?
DougBH
38
So Congress people can use their office for personal political gain and that’s ok but a President can’t use his office for personal political gain because…something?

Ceasar:
It’s one of 3 branches of government, it’s a check on the congress to prevent it from having too much power, as the congress can also do.
It’s NOT a crime, it’s sometimes a duty. Of course, it’s a crime for a republican President, but NEVER a democrat President.
In fact, a democrat can commit almost any crime & not be held accountable, you know, like Hillary, Bill, Obama, the Biden’s, & many others.
Let’s ask the Founders what they thought about maladministration and abuse of power.
Who did the founders intend to be the most powerful branch?
No, but since the Constitution was written so as not to fully enumerate the definition of High Crimes and Misdemeanors that really does not matter.