On the contrary I think it is you that does so, and its part and parcel of why we all see so many judicial activism threads on this site even when it isn’t actually so.
Ok, you are making the argument to preserve the EC because it causes presidential candidates to visit the small states like Alaska. So for your argument to have merit, the candidates, under our current EC, should be visiting Alaska, right?
In other words, you’re debating with me over something you know nothing about.
I gotcha. You’re simply spewing what your Democratic Politicians and
Fake News Media tell you to. Fair enough. At least I know where you stand now.
They don’t have to visit the state, personally. They can have a huge presence with their people on the ground, with proxies visiting for them and with their ad buys in the state, but they will not.
They will spend all their time and resources trying to please Californians, Floridians, and New Yorkers, instead.
You’re under the delusion that to have an impact in a state the candidate has to go to the state. NO.
He or she can send proxies, spend money on ad buys and put up a great ground game - all EXPENSIVE things they WOULD NOT need to do if all they needed were three or four states, and all the rest of the states get squat.
The Trump campaign comes to me and says, ‘How much money should we spend in Alaska?’ My response is, ‘Don’t spend a dime,’" Crawford said in a phone interview. “Alaska is a red state. We will deliver this election to Donald Trump.”
Yep, sounds like the state you chose as an example is getting no attention under the EC because they know it will vote republican.
So, your’re saying that a reporter gave them some advice and that is proof they didn’t do anything in Alaska???
Nice try. And you’re trying to hang your hat on ONE STATE, but in fact all a campiagn would need to do is concentrate on the four or five most populous states, without the EC.
That leaves FORTY FIVE unneccesary to the campaigns - or 48 of we are doing Obama’s state count.
Are you under the impression that Trump spent a lot in Alaska? I doubt he did. And here we have a Trump campaign worker giving Trump the exact same advice we told you happens under the current EC system.
You are the one that brought up Alaska so I used what you provided. Now you don’t like it. Ok, let’s try another small state-Wyoming. Any candidates go there? No? Under the EC, why aren’t they going there?
Are you speaking about the swing states in the EC? Cause it really comes down to only a few swing states every election, right? No reason to campaign in California if the result of all electors go to one candidate.
I’m pretty sure you’re wrong. China doesn’t even hold as much of our debt as Bush 43 added. That is more than 3 times what Clinton added, maybe that the 3X you’re thinking.